2005
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0501127102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulation of dynamical properties of normal and superfluid helium

Abstract: The formation of a superfluid when 4 He is cooled below the characteristic lambda transition temperature is accompanied by intricate quantum mechanical phenomena, including the emergence of a Bose condensate. A combination of path integral and semiclassical techniques is used to calculate the single-particle velocity autocorrelation function across the normal-to-superfluid transition. We find that the inclusion of particle exchange alters qualitatively the shape of the correlation function below the characteri… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
38
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
2
38
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It will be interesting to apply the LSC-IVR to complex systems at even lower temperature (such as normal and superfluid liquid He) where quantum effects are more pronounced, to see how well the Gaussian approximation (Eq. (2.10)) works 52,121 , and its comparison with the direct calculation of the incoherent dynamic structure factor using Eq. (2.6) and also with experimental data [121][122][123][124][125][126] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It will be interesting to apply the LSC-IVR to complex systems at even lower temperature (such as normal and superfluid liquid He) where quantum effects are more pronounced, to see how well the Gaussian approximation (Eq. (2.10)) works 52,121 , and its comparison with the direct calculation of the incoherent dynamic structure factor using Eq. (2.6) and also with experimental data [121][122][123][124][125][126] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The classical Wigner model is an old idea, but it is important to realize that it is contained within the SC-IVR approach, as a well-defined approximation to it 28,29 . There are other ways to derive the classical Wigner model (or one may simply postulate it) 9,35,40,41 , and we also note that the 'forward-backward semiclassical dynamics' (FBSD) approximation of Makri et al 32,[42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56] is very similar to it. The LSC-IVR/classical Wigner model cannot describe true quantum coherence effects in time correlation functions-more accurate SC-IVR approaches, such as the Fourier transform forward-backward IVR (FB-IVR) approach 22,57 (or the still more accurate generalized FB-IVR 58 ) of Miller et al, are needed for this-but it does describe some aspects of the quantum dynamics very well 26,[30][31][32]34,[59][60][61][62] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The classical Wigner model is an old idea, but it is important to realize that it is contained within the SC-IVR approach, as a well-defined approximation to it. There are other ways to derive the classical Wigner model (or one may simply postulate it) [28][29][30][31] , and we also note that the 'forward-backward semiclassical dynamics' (FBSD) approximation of Makri et al [32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39] is very similar to it. The LSC-IVR/classical Wigner model cannot describe true quantum coherence effects in time correlation functions-more accurate SC-IVR approaches, such as the Fourier transform forward-backward IVR (FB-IVR) approach 40,41 ( 23 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The classical Wigner model is an old idea, but it is important to realize that it is contained within the SC-IVR approach, as a well-defined approximation to it 39,40 . There are other ways to derive the classical Wigner model (or one may simply postulate it) 6,44,49,50 , and we also note that the 'forward-backward semiclassical dynamics' (FBSD) approximation of Makri et al 24,[28][29][30][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62] is very similar to it. The LSC-IVR/classical Wigner model cannot describe true quantum coherence effects in time correlation functions-more accurate SC-IVR approaches, such as the Fourier transform forward-backward IVR (FB-IVR) approach 22,63 , or the still more accurate generalized FB-IVR 64 and exact FB-IVR 5 of Miller et al , are needed for this-but it does describe some aspects of the quantum dynamics very well [24][25][26][34][35][36][37][38]41,42,[65][66][67] .…”
Section: ˆ/ Iht E −mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SC-IVR provides a way for generating the quantum time evolution operator (propagator) by computing an ensemble of classical trajectories, much as is done in standard classical MD simulations. As is well known from SC developments in the early 1970's 1,[18][19][20][21] , such approaches actually contain all quantum effects at least qualitatively, and in molecular systems the description is usually quite quantitative (see reviews [2][3][4][5]14,22,23 and some recent applications [24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38] ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%