2020
DOI: 10.5194/nhess-20-2791-2020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulation of extreme rainfall and streamflow events in small Mediterranean watersheds with a one-way-coupled atmospheric–hydrologic modelling system

Abstract: Abstract. Coupled atmospheric–hydrologic systems are increasingly used as instruments for flood forecasting and water management purposes, making the performance of the hydrologic routines a key indicator of the model functionality. This study's objectives were (i) to calibrate the one-way-coupled WRF-Hydro model for simulating extreme events in Cyprus with observed precipitation and (ii) to evaluate the model performance when forced with WRF-downscaled (1×1 km2) re-analysis precipitation data (ERA-Interim). T… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
20
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
3
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Arnault et al (2018) and Arnault, Wagner, et al (2016) brought evidence that a spinup period of a few months is sufficient to simulate realistic land surface conditions in Europe and West Africa with WRF‐Hydro. In this study, the five‐month spinup period is chosen as a compromise between the two‐week spinup period employed for example in Camera et al (2020), and a one‐year spinup period employed for example in Rummler et al (2019).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Arnault et al (2018) and Arnault, Wagner, et al (2016) brought evidence that a spinup period of a few months is sufficient to simulate realistic land surface conditions in Europe and West Africa with WRF‐Hydro. In this study, the five‐month spinup period is chosen as a compromise between the two‐week spinup period employed for example in Camera et al (2020), and a one‐year spinup period employed for example in Rummler et al (2019).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hydrological component of CHAOS is based on the WRF‐Hydro version 5.1.1 model (Gochis et al, 2020), because it is a fully‐distributed, multi‐physics, and multi‐scale hydrological model (Yucel, Onen, Yilmaz, & Gochis, 2015), with advanced capabilities for flood forecasting (Abbaszadeh, Gavahi, & Moradkhani, 2020; Avolio et al, 2019; Camera, Bruggeman, Zittis, Sofokleous, & Arnault, 2020; Furnari, Mendicino, & Senatore, 2020; Hunt & Menon, 2020; Lin et al, 2018; Ryu et al, 2017; Sun et al, 2020), and the ability to holistically represent atmosphere‐hydro‐land processes (Givati, Gochis, Rummler, & Kunstmann, 2016; Senatore et al, 2015). The hydrological component was set up on the innermost domain (D04: 250 m × 250 m) of the meteorological component covering the flooded region (Figure 3b).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the surface layer parameterization the Eta geophysical fluid dynamics laboratory (GFDL) scheme (Schwarzkopf and Fels, 1991) was adopted. The Noah land surface model scheme (Chen and Dudhia, 2001) and Mellor-Yamada-Janjić (MYJ) parameterization (Janjic, 2002) were chosen as land surface and planetary boundary layer schemes, respectively. Noah-MP introduces multiple options and tunable parameters to simulate the land surface processes.…”
Section: The Fully Coupled Modeling System 221 Advanced Research Wrfmentioning
confidence: 99%