2021 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium IGARSS 2021
DOI: 10.1109/igarss47720.2021.9554743
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulation of GNSS-R Signals in Arbitrary Viewing Geometry with a Closed-Form Bistatic Two-Scale Model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…GNSS-R processing chain and receive antenna beamwidth are accounted for as well for the evaluation of the seareflected signal SNR. Similar analyses were presented in [27,28]. Here we extend such analyses considering a wider set of acquisition geometries, and, additionally, provide a more general expression for the received signal strength which allows for more accurate results as discussed in detail in the following sections.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…GNSS-R processing chain and receive antenna beamwidth are accounted for as well for the evaluation of the seareflected signal SNR. Similar analyses were presented in [27,28]. Here we extend such analyses considering a wider set of acquisition geometries, and, additionally, provide a more general expression for the received signal strength which allows for more accurate results as discussed in detail in the following sections.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…It can be noted that both ( 5) and ( 6) provide a more accurate evaluation of the received signal strength respect to the simplified formulations adopted in [27,28], that can be obtained from (6) by further neglecting variations of the zenith and azimuth scattering angles within the scattering area A 0 . Such an assumption, despite being reasonable in spaceborne configurations, leads to inaccurate results with airborne GNSS-R due to the much lower receiver altitude [21].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%