1976
DOI: 10.1016/0308-521x(76)90010-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulation of growth and production in sheep-model 1: A computer program to estimate energy and nitrogen utilisation, body composition and empty liveweight change, day by day for sheep of any age

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
1

Year Published

1977
1977
1992
1992

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Searle et al (1982) observed that each kg of live-weight gain, in two genotypes of lamb, contained 326 g chemical fat in fast growing lambs (200 g/day) but 432 g fat in lambs growing at ca. The reduced P : E ratio of the diet in the slow-growing lambs resulted in a greater amount of ME being available for growth which was directed towards fat gain, rather than lean, as postulated by Black (1974) and Graham, Black, Faichney and Arnold (1976), and since confirmed by 0rskov, MacLeod, Fahmy, Istasse and Hovell (1983) using cattle. This compared with 145 g and 326 g dissected fat per kg live-weight gain in this experiment; the difference being due to fat in muscle, bone and internal organs not being measured by dissection techniques.…”
Section: Lambs At the Same Live Weight But Different Ages (H And Ll)mentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Searle et al (1982) observed that each kg of live-weight gain, in two genotypes of lamb, contained 326 g chemical fat in fast growing lambs (200 g/day) but 432 g fat in lambs growing at ca. The reduced P : E ratio of the diet in the slow-growing lambs resulted in a greater amount of ME being available for growth which was directed towards fat gain, rather than lean, as postulated by Black (1974) and Graham, Black, Faichney and Arnold (1976), and since confirmed by 0rskov, MacLeod, Fahmy, Istasse and Hovell (1983) using cattle. This compared with 145 g and 326 g dissected fat per kg live-weight gain in this experiment; the difference being due to fat in muscle, bone and internal organs not being measured by dissection techniques.…”
Section: Lambs At the Same Live Weight But Different Ages (H And Ll)mentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Maintenance The maintenance requirements of the animal are calculated from Graham et al (1976). From equations 2 a and 2b the rate of body-weight gain is The energy required for maintenance (EMa) is (Graham et al 1976, p. 124) ( 40 4where Wmet and Edig are given by equations 5 and 9 d. This energy is provided at the expense of the ATP pool, giving an ATP utilization rate for maintenance of EM, = 0.257 W e-o.oo0219(t-s8) + 2.8 ~ dWbody + 0.046Edig, where EAt is the energy content of ATP (MJ/kg mol), and is given by available at https:/www.cambridge.org/core/terms.…”
Section: ( 3 3mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Gill et al (1984) used the empirical relationship of Black & Griffiths (1975) to estimate the maximum rate of protein synthesis and the empirical equation of Graham et al (1976) to calculate maintenance energy requirements. Similarly, Pettigrew et al (1989) estimated values for maximum reaction rates and for affinity and inhibition constants from empirical data on such measures as body protein, fat depletion and milk yield of sows.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%