2010
DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/245/1/012007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulation of MeV electron energy deposition in CdS quantum dots absorbed in silicate glass for radiation dosimetry

Abstract: We are currently developing 2D dosimeters with optical readout based on CdS or CdS/CdSe core-shell quantum-dots using commercially available materials. In order to understand the limitations on the measurement of a 2D radiation profile the 3D deposited energy profile of MeV energy electrons in CdS quantum-dot-doped silica glass have been studied by Monte Carlo simulation using the CASINO and PENELOPE codes. Profiles for silica glass and CdS quantum-dot-doped silica glass were then compared.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
(7 reference statements)
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…10 clearly demonstrates that the investigated QD samples can detect the X-rays within the RMI energy range. This finding is in agreement with the work of other investigators (Del Sordo et al, 2009;Stodilka et al, 2009;Baharin et al, 2010;Hobson et al, 2011). It is important that this paper was the first one in which a variety of methods has been introduced and compared to understand the underlying mechanisms of the X-ray induced emission of the Lumidot QD system, focusing on the differences of their acquisition and detection ability.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…10 clearly demonstrates that the investigated QD samples can detect the X-rays within the RMI energy range. This finding is in agreement with the work of other investigators (Del Sordo et al, 2009;Stodilka et al, 2009;Baharin et al, 2010;Hobson et al, 2011). It is important that this paper was the first one in which a variety of methods has been introduced and compared to understand the underlying mechanisms of the X-ray induced emission of the Lumidot QD system, focusing on the differences of their acquisition and detection ability.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Simultaneously, the novel designs need to be explored through a combination of modelling and experimentation. Noteworthy advances in this field of research include the construction of sensors of small size (Rodnyi, 2001;Michail et al, 2015a), nanophosphors Seferis et al, 2014Seferis et al, , 2015 and QDs (Zych et al, 2003;Kim et al, 2007;Konstantatos et al, 2007;Del Sordo et al, 2009;Rauch et al, 2009;Stodilka et al, 2009;Baharin et al, 2010;Malyukin, 2010;Hobson et al, 2011;Konstantatos and Sargent, 2011;Lawrence et al, 2012). QDs resemble particle size of the order of 1 nme20 nm (Goncharova et al, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations