2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.mechmat.2015.06.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulation of micromechanical damage to obtain mechanical properties of bimodal Al using XFEM

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Different modeling techniques have been used to model crack initiation and propagation. The predominant method used over the past decade is the extended Finite Element Method (XFEM) due to its advantage of crack path independence [24,25]. The most common way to validate the simulation predication is the capability to reproduce the macroscopic experimental stress-strain [26,27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different modeling techniques have been used to model crack initiation and propagation. The predominant method used over the past decade is the extended Finite Element Method (XFEM) due to its advantage of crack path independence [24,25]. The most common way to validate the simulation predication is the capability to reproduce the macroscopic experimental stress-strain [26,27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Schiavone et al [7] used both Gurson model and XFEM to capture fracture behavior in Aluminium specimens with different notched shapes and observed that the crack shapes were predicted correctly using two approaches, with the exception of the square-notch case using XFEM. Hosseini-Toudeshky and Jamalian [8] performed fracture modeling for bulk Aluminium Al5083 using XFEM and predicted the ductile fracture behavior of Al5083 very well by demonstrating the comparison of stress-strain behavior results between simulations and tests. Vajragupta et al [9] employed XFEM technique to capture fracture behavior of dual phases steel (DP steel), where both ductile fracture and brittle fracture were observed, and demonstrated the capability of XFEM for predicting both ductile and brittle fracture in the same specimen.…”
Section: Possible Approaches To Simulate Fracture Of Steel Under Uniamentioning
confidence: 87%
“…In the work of Muhond et al [8], some trace elements (S, B, Se) were observed to stabilise the flake or nodular growth morphology of graphite, while F, O, N, P failed to do so. In general, there are two main approaches used for modelling the mechanical behaviour of CGI: representative volume element (RVE) and unit cell [9][10][11][12]. To the best of the author's knowledge, these two approaches are widely used in the field of computational mechanics to simulate the fracture behaviours of heterogeneous materials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the last decades, four main methods were used to simulate the fracture behaviours of materials [9,10,15,[22][23][24]: (i) the cohesive-zone model (CZM); (ii) the extended finiteelement method (XFEM); (iii) the Johnson-Cook (JC) damage model; and (IV) phase-field modelling. XFEM is a mesh-free method that can be used to simulate crack initiation and propagation in static, quasi-static, and dynamic problems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%