2014
DOI: 10.1002/nag.2305
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulation of non‐planar three‐dimensional hydraulic fracture propagation

Abstract: SUMMARYHydraulic fracturing is the method of choice to enhance reservoir permeability and well efficiency for extraction of shale gas. Multi‐stranded non‐planar hydraulic fractures are often observed in stimulation sites. Non‐planar fractures propagating from wellbores inclined from the direction of maximum horizontal stress have also been reported. The pressure required to propagate non‐planar fractures is in general higher than in the case of planar fractures. Current computational methods for the simulation… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
135
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 153 publications
(136 citation statements)
references
References 89 publications
1
135
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Essentially, two main methods for the solution of elasticity sub-problem are used in the papers that concern 3D initiation and evolution of hydraulic fractures: the finite element method (FEM) (Gupta and Duarte 2014) and the boundary element method (BEM). The prototype of the latter is the so-called "direct method" of linear elasticity based on Somigliana's solution (Rizzo 1967).…”
Section: Solution Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Essentially, two main methods for the solution of elasticity sub-problem are used in the papers that concern 3D initiation and evolution of hydraulic fractures: the finite element method (FEM) (Gupta and Duarte 2014) and the boundary element method (BEM). The prototype of the latter is the so-called "direct method" of linear elasticity based on Somigliana's solution (Rizzo 1967).…”
Section: Solution Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The classical formulation of the strain energy release rate criterion for the spatial mixed mode loading fractures (Nuismer 1975;Germanovich and Cherepanov 1995;Weber and Kuhn 2008;Gupta and Duarte 2014) consists in the following. The fracture propagates when the energy release rate in the direction of crack propagation θ * reaches the critical energy release rate of the material (G-criterion)…”
Section: The Strain Energy Release Rate Criterionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the limit of toughness dominated propagation (which implies a uniform distribution of fluid pressure), Gupta and Duarte (2014) have developed a formulation to model 3D mixed mode hydraulic fracture propagation, although conserving the continuity of the fracture front and therefore not fully reproducing the fracture front segmentation observed experimentally under mixed mode I+III. The formulation has been extended to account for the coupling with lubrication flow (Gupta and Duarte, 2015) and results for the case of a static fracture (no propagation) presented.…”
Section: Extended / Generalized Finite Element Formulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FEM with advanced remeshing technologies is still difficult to implement for field-scale reservoirs because of the meshing burden. The extended finite element method (XFEM) [18][19][20] and the generalized finite element method (GFEM) [21,22] have been proposed to overcome the meshing burden associated with FEM and applied to model hydraulic fracturing. However, XFEM and GFEM still have difficulties in representing multiple complex fracture networks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%