2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0927-0256(02)00388-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulation of plastic deformation localization in composite materials with hard inclusions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For quasi-brittle materials-materials that are neither plastic nor brittle at the usual engineering length scale-failure is often caused by nonlinear phenomena, such as fracture, damage localization, and frictional shearing, that occur at weak spots in the internal material structure. These weak spots coincide, for example, with interfaces among particles in particulate materials (Dvorkin et al 1994), weak matrix layers in composites with hard inclusions (Lasko et al 2003), and compliant interfaces between stiff material grains (Kulkarni et al 2009), and they are typically characterized by a specific geometry and characteristic size d; spacing ℓ; and orientation ( Fig. 1).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For quasi-brittle materials-materials that are neither plastic nor brittle at the usual engineering length scale-failure is often caused by nonlinear phenomena, such as fracture, damage localization, and frictional shearing, that occur at weak spots in the internal material structure. These weak spots coincide, for example, with interfaces among particles in particulate materials (Dvorkin et al 1994), weak matrix layers in composites with hard inclusions (Lasko et al 2003), and compliant interfaces between stiff material grains (Kulkarni et al 2009), and they are typically characterized by a specific geometry and characteristic size d; spacing ℓ; and orientation ( Fig. 1).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In each blend system, the degree of mixing of the blend having a morphology of hard domain/soft matrix (such as the 40/60 or the 20/80 PMMA/nylon 6,6 compositions and the 35/65 or the 17/83 nylon 6/EVA compositions) is better than that of the blend having a morphology of hard matrix/soft domain (such as the 80/20 or the 60/40 PMMA/nylon 6,6 compositions and the 35/65 or the 55/45 nylon 6/EVA compositions). The above results have been predicted by using the unified theory for adhesion4 in conjunction with a new rheological theory for multicomponent blends. The new rheological theory and its applications will be discussed in a future study.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…The first method is to mix a hard second‐phase (inclusion) material, such as glass fiber, mineral fillers, and hard polymer inclusions, into a polymer matrix. This method effectively raises the modulus value of the plastics 4, 5. The second method is to blend a soft second‐phase material, such as soft polymer inclusions and plasticizers, into the polymer matrix.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Das thermomechanische Verhalten und die Versagensmechanismen dieser Werkstoffgruppe wurden in den vergangenen Jahren ausführlich diskutiert [7,8]. Hervorzuheben sind dabei das unterschiedliche thermomechanische Verhalten der Gefügebe-standteile sowie der komplexe Eigenspannungszustand makroskopischer und mikroskopischer Natur.…”
Section: Werkstoffcharakterisierungunclassified