2019
DOI: 10.1002/ceat.201800667
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulation of Post‐Combustion CO2 Capture, a Comparison among Absorption, Adsorption and Membranes

Abstract: Post‐combustion CO2 capture was studied in the favorable context where the captured CO2 can be reused in a neighboring industrial process. Three technologies for CO2 capture, absorption by amines, adsorption on activated carbon, and separation using polymer membranes, were considered, modeled and compared. The three capture processes were designed for achieving the same performances. The models were integrated in a commercial flowsheeting software. The results show that, for a targeted CO2 purity of 95 %, the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, electricity source can only evolve for 40% of the consumption value. Since capture with absorption is the most mature postcombustion technique (RECORD 2013;Anselmi et al, 2019), several reagents are added in the process, such as monoethanolamine, activated carbon and sodium hydroxide.…”
Section: Life Cycle Inventorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, electricity source can only evolve for 40% of the consumption value. Since capture with absorption is the most mature postcombustion technique (RECORD 2013;Anselmi et al, 2019), several reagents are added in the process, such as monoethanolamine, activated carbon and sodium hydroxide.…”
Section: Life Cycle Inventorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The membrane separation process was modelled using MEMSIC, a third-party module [26], which was integrated in the Aspen Plus model. Different configurations were tested and a two-stage arrangement of two different polymer membranes was selected to achieve the specifications [21].…”
Section: Membrane Separationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This model includes the different part of the chemical process itself and the coal-fired power plant as well. Models of the selected CC technologies were then developed using Aspen Plus and Aspen adsorption [21] and incorporated in a global Aspen Plus flowsheet representative of the whole plant. Such an approach ensures that all the mass and energy balances are respected and that the CC facilities considered are well designed to fit all the requirements and constraints of the considered plant.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although a widely used method, it has a number of disadvantages, for instance, loss of the sorbent caused by thermal degradation and potential release of dangerous substances. In addition, this method is energy intensive due to the absorbent regeneration procedure requiring quite high capital costs, owing to the complicated design of the equipment and thus the large square of the plants [3][4][5]. Hence, the enhancement of the CO 2 removal process should be achieved by the development of new sorbents with high sorption capacity in relation to CO 2 and/or development and improvement in separation techniques.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%