2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.epsr.2007.04.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulation of producers behaviour in the electricity market by evolutionary games

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
21
0
5

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
21
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Several methods and theories have been introduced and utilized to model different aspects of deregulated pool-based electricity markets. Agent-based modeling [1][2][3], statistical methods [4,5], artificial intelligence based approaches [6][7][8], optimization theory [9], and of course game-theoretic approaches [10][11][12][13][14] have been all frequently used in the literature. Among these approaches, game theoretic methods not only have better ways of realistically simulating the oligopolistic competition in electric power markets, but also are perfectly applicable to a wide range of market models such as Bertrand, Cournot, Stackelberg and supply function models [15][16][17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several methods and theories have been introduced and utilized to model different aspects of deregulated pool-based electricity markets. Agent-based modeling [1][2][3], statistical methods [4,5], artificial intelligence based approaches [6][7][8], optimization theory [9], and of course game-theoretic approaches [10][11][12][13][14] have been all frequently used in the literature. Among these approaches, game theoretic methods not only have better ways of realistically simulating the oligopolistic competition in electric power markets, but also are perfectly applicable to a wide range of market models such as Bertrand, Cournot, Stackelberg and supply function models [15][16][17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Reference [20], every GenCO and DisCO was assumed to have imperfect information about ongoing strategies of its rivals, but complete information about historical ones so that the parameters in optimization model of every GenCO or DisCO were estimated as the historical strategies of its rivals. In the study by Menniti et al [21], an evolutionary game model only to simulate the behaviors of the generation-side was proposed, and the modeling approaches of this paper can also be extended to the consumption-side issue. The classical evolutionary game theory can only solve problems with a discrete strategy set, which is not in line with the actual situation in the day-ahead electricity market.…”
Section: Literature Review and Main Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Taking [8,12,13,[20][21][22] as references, we only consider one (negotiation) time interval for the next day. Hence, maximizing Equations (5) and (6) are the objectives of GenCO i and DisCO j in the double-side day-ahead electricity market, respectively.…”
Section: Participants' Bidding Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Ref. [16] used evolutionary games and near Nash equilibrium to model competition in electricity markets and predict local marginal prices. Additionally, the authors in [17] implemented the agent-based reasoning through a Dynamic Bayesian Network (DBN) representation and proposed an online Bayesian learning algorithm to predict loads and Residual Demand Curves (RDC).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%