2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2017.06.078
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulation of pyrolysis in low rank coal particle by using DAEM kinetics model: Reaction behavior and heat transfer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
31
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
4
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the temperature gradient becomes more apparent with the increase in particle size, and a thermal inertia or thermal lag occurs in the core temperature-rise history. These results are consistent with the published work [35,40]. In addition, it can be seen from Figures 4 and 5 that the peak rate of tar release (daf mass fraction basis) is about 10 times as much as that of other components, except H2O.…”
Section: Effect Of Particle Size On the Heat Transfer And Volatile Yieldsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, the temperature gradient becomes more apparent with the increase in particle size, and a thermal inertia or thermal lag occurs in the core temperature-rise history. These results are consistent with the published work [35,40]. In addition, it can be seen from Figures 4 and 5 that the peak rate of tar release (daf mass fraction basis) is about 10 times as much as that of other components, except H2O.…”
Section: Effect Of Particle Size On the Heat Transfer And Volatile Yieldsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Previous studies [20,21,35] have accurately predicted the temperature distribution and volatile matter release during coal pyrolysis, with the particles size ranging from 3 mm to 16 mm. In respect to large particle sizes, e.g, more than 20 mm, which can be accepted by pyrolysis or gasification in the fixed/moving bed [36] and Lurgi-Spuelgas (L-S) gasifier, they are still under investigation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two non-isothermal methods, DAEM and FWO were selected for comparative kinetic analysis. As a model for simulating complex pyrolysis processes, DAEM is not only effective and accurate, but also has many first-order parallel irreversible reactions [24]. It is assumed that errors caused by function mechanism functions can be effectively avoided by using FWO, thus, it is often used to directly find the activation energy [25][26][27].…”
Section: Kinetic Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The linear correlation coefficient R 2 > 0.95 indicates that E 0 and ln(k 0 ) basically satisfy the kinetic compensation effect. A method reported by Wang et al 28 was adopted to obtain more reasonable kinetic parameters (E 0 , k 0 and s). The average value of activation energy for the conversion rate varying from 0.10 to 0.90 was used as the activation energy E 0 of the DAEM.…”
Section: Daem Kinetics Of Different Stagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the above methods, the distributed activation energy model (DAEM) is also a widely used pyrolysis kinetic model. [21][22][23][24][25] Compared with the traditional C-R method, DAEM has made great progress in data processing methods such as the Miura differential method 26 and the Miura integral method 27 to eliminate the effect of heating rate on the solutions to the kinetic parameters, and this method has been widely applied in the study of the pyrolysis kinetics of organic polymers such as coal, 28 solid waste 24 and biomass. 29 However, few reports on the thermal debinding kinetics of gelcast ceramic bodies using DAEM are currently available.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%