2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.egypro.2017.07.154
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulation of Reacting Moving Granular Material in Furnaces and Boilers An Overview on the Capabilities Of the Discrete Element Method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The geometrical dimensions of 100 pellets are randomly measured by the Vernier Calipers; they can get a pellet with an average length L of 7.98 mm and an average radius R of 2.5 mm. At the same time, if the density measurement of a pellet is 1538 kg•m −3 , then the discrete element modeling of a pellet is established according to the above data [16,[35][36][37][38][39][40][41]. In order to truly restore the state of the pellets and consider the computation of the simulation test, it is usually necessary to adjust the number and size of subspheres.…”
Section: Simulation Conditionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The geometrical dimensions of 100 pellets are randomly measured by the Vernier Calipers; they can get a pellet with an average length L of 7.98 mm and an average radius R of 2.5 mm. At the same time, if the density measurement of a pellet is 1538 kg•m −3 , then the discrete element modeling of a pellet is established according to the above data [16,[35][36][37][38][39][40][41]. In order to truly restore the state of the pellets and consider the computation of the simulation test, it is usually necessary to adjust the number and size of subspheres.…”
Section: Simulation Conditionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, despite the relatively low number of cells (120,000 computing cells for CFD simulation in [23]), the CFD-DEM coupling method is complex and, above all, highly time-consuming, which make its use for industrial scale simulations problematic. DEM simulations are more computationally expensive than CFD [60], especially for the large amount of stones involved in this case. In addition to the two different types of simulations, it is necessary to implement a communication system to translate data between them.…”
Section: Limestone Calcination Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These last two reviews, however, are mainly limited to small particles (mm‐range, thermally thin), with the typical application being fluidized beds. An early overview on the DEM/CFD simulation of thermally thick particles is given by Scherer et al in 2017 13.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%