2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.optlaseng.2022.107438
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulation of realistic speckle fields by using surface integral equation and multi-level fast multipole method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this research, a simulation tool based on the BEM method, accelerated through multilevel fast multipole method for aperiodic 3D structures, was utilized to simulate the RS-N grating structures for the comparison. 24 An essential difference between BEM and the other two methods, FMM and FEM applied for this research, is that BEM is for modeling 3D isolated structures, whereas the presented FMM and FEM are typically employed for analyzing 2D and 3D periodic structures. Thus, the grating calculated using BEM has a limited size in both the x-and y-directions, which is an aperiodic 3D object with open boundaries.…”
Section: Bem Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this research, a simulation tool based on the BEM method, accelerated through multilevel fast multipole method for aperiodic 3D structures, was utilized to simulate the RS-N grating structures for the comparison. 24 An essential difference between BEM and the other two methods, FMM and FEM applied for this research, is that BEM is for modeling 3D isolated structures, whereas the presented FMM and FEM are typically employed for analyzing 2D and 3D periodic structures. Thus, the grating calculated using BEM has a limited size in both the x-and y-directions, which is an aperiodic 3D object with open boundaries.…”
Section: Bem Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To simulate the light-surface interaction the boundary element method (BEM) simulation tool SpeckleSim, provided by the ITO of the University of Stuttgart, is used. The simulation tool SpeckleSim solves the Maxwell equations numerically for large scale nonperiodic 3D surfaces with a realistic computation time and allows a physically correct modeling of more complex rough surface structures [1]. To see the differences of SpeckleSim to other simulation tools, a comparison between SpeckleSim, JCMsuite [2] and Ansys Lumerical [3] is made.…”
Section: Rigorous Maxwell Solvermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, with reduced size and increased complexity of structures, rigorous modeling becomes indispensable to deal with multi-scattering and polarization effects. In the past, we have developed a 3D modeling tool based on the surface integral equation (SIE) method, or alternatively boundary element method (BEM) [2]. Therein, the effective electrical and magnetic currents induced on the surface by the illumination are solved first, and then the scattered field in an arbitrary plane spatially separate from the surface is calculated.…”
Section: Scattering Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%