The University of Queensland operates three large scale free-piston drivers which consists of the T4, X2 and X3 facilities. These facilities are designed for the worst case scenarios based on conservative analytical impact mechanics, in terms of avoiding catastrophic piston impacts. However, these do not accurately predict the mechanical response for complex real geometry in the event of a piston impact.In 2009, there was a high speed impact of a heavy piston that rendered the facility inoperable for two months. Repeated attempts were made to relieve enough stress in the plastically deformed piston to dislodge it from the compression tube. This impact reiterated the potential damage that can be caused by incorrect operation of the free-piston drivers and revealed that there was no structured methodology to estimate the condition of the facility to inform the repair procedure.In this study, the AUTODYN solver was used to investigate three main explicit structural analysis problems including recreating the 2009 T4 high speed piston impact, perfoming a transient stress analysis of the peak pressure loadings acting on X2's lightweight piston using high strain rate material data and analysing the buffer for the X3 facility.The approach to this study involved testing the solver's ability to capture the physical mechanisms involved during a high speed piston impact. An axisymmetric analysis of T4 shot 10509 was later developed where the numerical results were compared to observational comments of the facility made by the technician following the repair job. This approach to using an axisymmetric model was also used to analyse the peak pressure loadings acting on the X2 piston and the results from this were validated against a static structural analysis. An axisymmetric model of the X3 buffer was developed and this was validated against a 3D model. This study has shown that the AUTODYN solver can be used to model high speed piston impacts with relative confidence. Furthermore, there was enough evidence to show that the numerical recreation of T4 shot 10509 did agree with the technician's observations following T4 shot 10509. This allowed for the response of the facility at higher impact speeds and with varying material properties to be investigated. The transient analysis conducted for the X2 lightweight piston agreed closely with the static structural analysis conducted prior. Since the X3 lightweight piston was made out of similar materials to the X2 piston, this validated the material data used for the X3 piston. It was also discovered that the nylon studs in the X3 facility would not likely fracture from an impact speed of 30 m/s by the X3 lightweight piston. This quantification of safe impact speeds for the X3 buffer was deemed important following the development of new driver operating conditons for the X3 facility.ii Acknowledgements Foremost, I would like to thank my supervisor Dr Gildfind for his continued support throughout the year, and faith in my ability to overcome all obstacles that got in my way....