2018
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-06390-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulation of slip transients and earthquakes in finite thickness shear zones with a plastic formulation

Abstract: We perform numerical experiments of damped quasi-dynamic fault slip that include a rate-and-state behavior at steady state to simulate earthquakes and a plastic rheology to model permanent strain. The model shear zone has a finite width which represents a natural fault zone. Here we reproduce fast and slow events that follow theoretical and observational scaling relationships for earthquakes and slow slip events (SSEs). We show that the transition between fast and slow slip occurs when the friction drop in the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
31
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
1
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These characteristics are similar in all the cases displaying mixed‐mode slip behaviors (Figure 4). These events follow the scaling relationships described in Tong and Lavier (2018). The durations and moments of modeled slow events plot around the linear relationship observed in natural SSEs (Ide et al., 2007; Peng & Gomberg, 2010) while those of the simulated earthquakes plot near the cubic moment‐duration scaling.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These characteristics are similar in all the cases displaying mixed‐mode slip behaviors (Figure 4). These events follow the scaling relationships described in Tong and Lavier (2018). The durations and moments of modeled slow events plot around the linear relationship observed in natural SSEs (Ide et al., 2007; Peng & Gomberg, 2010) while those of the simulated earthquakes plot near the cubic moment‐duration scaling.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…A fault zone of finite thickness is used to simulate the formation of shear zones and fractures on which creep and slip events occur following the numerical approach of Tong and Lavier (2018). A key aspect of this numerical method is that it simulates long‐term tectonic processes and earthquakes by using an adaptive time stepping algorithm (Lapusta & Liu, 2009; Lapusta et al., 2000; Tong & Lavier, 2018). The quasistatic solution to the momentum equation is reached by using dynamic relaxation that damps the inertial components of motion (Choi et al., 2013; Cundall, 1989; Tan et al., 2012; Tong & Lavier, 2018).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several variants of rate‐and‐state fault models can significantly extend the range of parameters suitable for SSEs, including changes from velocity‐weakening to velocity‐strengthening friction with increasing slip rates (Leeman et al, 2016; Shibazaki & Shimamoto, 2007), geometric complexities and roughness (Li & Liu, 2016; Ozawa et al, 2019; Romanet et al, 2018), and decreases in pore fluid pressure due to shear‐induced dilatancy (Marone et al, 1990; Segall & Rice, 1995; Segall et al, 2010). SSEs can also be obtained in models of rate‐and‐state faults with velocity‐strengthening friction and additional destabilizing effects, for example, poroelastic (Heimisson et al, 2019), and in models with viscoplastic bulk effects (Tong & Lavier, 2018). Here, we show that a model of SSEs on a rate‐and‐state fault with a depth‐bounded velocity‐weakening region (Figure 1e) can explain the cubic moment‐duration scaling of slow slip observed in Cascadia.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The brittle/ductile transition, which marks the downdip limit of the SZ, is also a key feature notably controlling the seismicity and surface deformation (e.g., Hyndman et al., 1997). Several studies especially show that transient behavior may also be related to the interaction of unstable brittle and stable ductile behavior in mélanges in the transitions zones of the megathrust fault zone (Fagereng & Sibson, 2010; Hayman & Lavier, 2014; Saffer & Wallace, 2015; Tong & Lavier, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%