2011
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)gm.1943-5622.0000086
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulation of Soil Behavior under Blast Loading

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
38
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is necessary to determine the pressure Numerical simulation of crater creating process in dynamic replacement method by smooth particle hydrodynamics 7 in shock compressed solid. The most popular ones (for structures under crash and impact) are MieGrüneisen equation of state and polynomial equation of state (after An [15]). …”
Section: (20)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is necessary to determine the pressure Numerical simulation of crater creating process in dynamic replacement method by smooth particle hydrodynamics 7 in shock compressed solid. The most popular ones (for structures under crash and impact) are MieGrüneisen equation of state and polynomial equation of state (after An [15]). …”
Section: (20)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All material models available in LS-DYNA software were tested in literature in the cases of large displacement and impact on soil (Thomas et al [14], An [15], Heymsfield and Fasanella 2008, Kulak and Schwer [10]). The MAT005 chosen by the authors is a relatively simple elastic-plastic model with pressure dependent parabolic yield function with linear isotropic hardening.…”
Section: Constitutive Equationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This type of model works well for geomaterials under high pressure and is capable of recapturing the strain rate effect. It has been utilized and validated in Katona , Simo et al , Tong and Tuan , An et al , Aráoz and Luccioni , and so on for both high and low strain rate phenomena. In addition, a variable bulk modulus is also employed herein to account for the nonlinear pressure‐volume relationship (EOS) of CPB under high amplitude impact.…”
Section: Modeling Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By following the work in Murray and Jiang and Zhao , and given that the curing time is not known, all of the cap parameters were calibrated against the UCS. Besides, in considering that fresh cemented tailings backfill may behave in a similar manner as saturated sandy soil when just placed and its strength has not been developed yet, the parameters of a cap model used for saturated sandy soil have also been used. In numerical cases where a nonlinear Drucker–Prager criterion has been used (e.g., Equation (a)), the initial linear portion of such envelope is adopted to determine c and φ , thus determining the UCS in accordance with the Mohr–Coulomb criterion.…”
Section: Formulation Of the Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The applications of HSR loading can be related to blasting [1], earthquakes [2], mine blasts [3], aircraft wheel loading [4], dynamic compaction [5]; in situ subsurface explorations [6][7][8], pile driving and rapid load testing of piles [9], and projectile penetration [10,11]. These applications provoke transient loading characterized by large strains in the soil over very short periods of time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%