2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2023.108035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulation of the 2022 Mw 6.6 Luding, China, earthquake by a stochastic finite-fault model with a nonstationary phase

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 55 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To collect seismic-signal data, it is necessary to install multiple sensors in the ground, and a real ground-truth dataset is essential, involving manual checking for the P-wave FAP in the seismic signals. However, training a deep-learning model requires a large dataset, and it is extremely challenging to secure enough data to accurately detect the P-wave FAP [28]. To overcome this limitation, we used the SMSIM program to generate seismic signals with intensities similar to those of earthquakes in South Korea.…”
Section: Seismic-signal Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To collect seismic-signal data, it is necessary to install multiple sensors in the ground, and a real ground-truth dataset is essential, involving manual checking for the P-wave FAP in the seismic signals. However, training a deep-learning model requires a large dataset, and it is extremely challenging to secure enough data to accurately detect the P-wave FAP [28]. To overcome this limitation, we used the SMSIM program to generate seismic signals with intensities similar to those of earthquakes in South Korea.…”
Section: Seismic-signal Datamentioning
confidence: 99%