2011
DOI: 10.1007/s11069-011-9883-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulation of the climate of the XX century in the Alpine space

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A configuration quite similar to the one adopted in the present work has been already validated in a work concerning the Italian climate [Bucchignani et al, 2013b], showing satisfactory results. With respect to the model configuration used by Bucchignani et al [2013a], the number of soil levels has been increased from 5 to 7, and the Runge-Kutta scheme (and its order) has been changed, as well as the description of the forests, and some parameters for the turbulent diffusion parameterization and for the cloud representation. Moreover, the frequency of convection scheme has been modified, and finally, the subgrid scale orography processes have been introduced.…”
Section: The Simulation Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…A configuration quite similar to the one adopted in the present work has been already validated in a work concerning the Italian climate [Bucchignani et al, 2013b], showing satisfactory results. With respect to the model configuration used by Bucchignani et al [2013a], the number of soil levels has been increased from 5 to 7, and the Runge-Kutta scheme (and its order) has been changed, as well as the description of the forests, and some parameters for the turbulent diffusion parameterization and for the cloud representation. Moreover, the frequency of convection scheme has been modified, and finally, the subgrid scale orography processes have been introduced.…”
Section: The Simulation Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A direct comparison with the results of Bucchignani et al [2013a] is not possible, because in that work, a different data set (CRU) was used for validation. However, it is worth noting that the strong cold bias present in winter in some areas in the mentioned paper has now been removed, while in summer, the already good results have been generally improved.…”
Section: 1002/2013jd021105mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The winter overestimation over mountain areas is very likely due to an underestimation of the orographic effects: In presence of a mountainous terrain, the airflow experiences a forced lifting, causing an adiabatic cooling and condensation. This effect can be underestimated, if the resolution of the orography is not fine enough, so an overestimation of the precipitation on the lee side of the mountains may occur [25]. Since summer precipitation is mainly due to convection, the observed bias proves that the model resolution is not fine enough to capture phenomena such as localized convection.…”
Section: Precipitationmentioning
confidence: 99%