2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2007.07.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulation of the effect of windbreaks on odour dispersion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Windbreak effects on heating and cooling relate to wind speed reduction and thermal insulation (He & Hoyano, 2009). Windbreaks can even slow the dispersion and intensity of foul odors (Lin et al, 2007). Windbreak savings are highly variable and depend on tree size, leaf porosity, structure type, and distance from the structure being protected.…”
Section: The Nature Of Urban Forest and Tree Benefitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Windbreak effects on heating and cooling relate to wind speed reduction and thermal insulation (He & Hoyano, 2009). Windbreaks can even slow the dispersion and intensity of foul odors (Lin et al, 2007). Windbreak savings are highly variable and depend on tree size, leaf porosity, structure type, and distance from the structure being protected.…”
Section: The Nature Of Urban Forest and Tree Benefitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3. The structure of the trees forming the windbreak, where H is the total height; a) conifer; b) poplar (Lin et al, 2007b) where z is the coordinate value in the vertical direction; H is the height of the windbreak; h 1 is the height at which the porosity of the windbreak changes (0 < h 1 < H), and; w 1 , w 2 , and w 3 are three constants corresponding to the thickness of the real windbreak, set in the simulation to allow 66 % of the air to pass through. For the windbreak on site 2, the averaged optical porosity was 0.35: the optical porosity at the base was 0.40; that between heights of 3 to 14 m was 0.3, and; above 14 m, the porosity was gradually increased from 0.3 to 1.0.…”
Section: Describing the Windbreakmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Corresponding to the physical conditions of the ground surface, z 0 was 0.13 m (Lin et al, 2007b). The coefficient L MO was estimated from the Pasquill atmospheric stability categories.…”
Section: Boundary Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations