2002
DOI: 10.1006/nimg.2002.1226
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulation of the Effects of Global Normalization Procedures in Functional MRI

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
57
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
4
57
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…To account for potential indeterminate noise, 23,24 we also identified seeds of CSF and white matter on each individual functional EPI, and their time courses were added as covariates of no interest (nuisance) into each of the seed-ROI voxelwise correlation analyses to remove nonneural contributions to the blood oxygen level-dependent signal and thus enhance specificity. Similarly, the age of the study participants and volumes of the specific seeds were entered as nuisance covariates.…”
Section: Image Processing and Data Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To account for potential indeterminate noise, 23,24 we also identified seeds of CSF and white matter on each individual functional EPI, and their time courses were added as covariates of no interest (nuisance) into each of the seed-ROI voxelwise correlation analyses to remove nonneural contributions to the blood oxygen level-dependent signal and thus enhance specificity. Similarly, the age of the study participants and volumes of the specific seeds were entered as nuisance covariates.…”
Section: Image Processing and Data Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A general linear model (Friston, et al 1995), and a box-car design convolved with a canonical hemodynamic response function (HRF) were used to calculate the activation maps. Since global normalization in SPM can produce false deactivation signals (Aguirre, et al 1998;Gavrilescu, et al 2002), the BOLD signal strength was estimated without the removal of global effects. The time series were band-pass filtered with the HRF as low pass filter, and an additional high-pass filter (cut-off frequency: 1/126Hz for WM, 1/256 for VA).…”
Section: Data Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No global scaling (Della-Maggiore, Chau, Peres-Neto, & McIntosh, 2002;Gavrilescu et al, 2002) and no low-pass filtering were used.…”
Section: Fmri Acquisition and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%