2011
DOI: 10.5194/acpd-11-8027-2011
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulation of the mineral dust content over Western Africa with the CHIMERE-DUST model from the event to the annual scale

Abstract: The chemistry and transport model CHIMERE-Dust have been used to simulate the mineral dust cycle over the Sahara in 2006. Surface measurements deployed during the AMMA field campaign allows to test the capability of the model to correctly reproduce the atmospheric dust load and surface concentrations from the daily to the seasonal time-scale. The seasonal pattern simulated for Aerosol Optical Depth and surface concentrations are in good agreement with observations. The simulated daily concentrations and hourly… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The dust emission flux is highly sensitive to the surface wind speed (Luo et al, ; Schmechtig et al, ). In Z03 and K14, the dust emission varies with the cube of friction velocity; in G01, the dust emission is proportional to the cube of 10‐m wind speed.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dust emission flux is highly sensitive to the surface wind speed (Luo et al, ; Schmechtig et al, ). In Z03 and K14, the dust emission varies with the cube of friction velocity; in G01, the dust emission is proportional to the cube of 10‐m wind speed.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This last product has been recently used to detect dust sources in West Africa by Ginoux et al [2010], over an area (0°N–20°N, 0°E–20°E) that partly overlap our simulation domain. As reminded by Schmechtig et al [2011], these two satellite‐derived products have some limitations: the UV Aerosol Index is sensitive to the aerosol layer altitude and thus may not produce the higher indexes at the exact source, whereas the Deep Blue AOD is available for non cloudy conditions only. Thus it is better to check the simulated sources by comparing them to both products.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used the dust emission model developed by Marticorena and Bergametti [1995], Marticorena et al [1997a] and Laurent et al [2008] ‐ written MB hereafter. This model allows to account for the surface properties (soil moisture, roughness length, soil size distribution…) and the simulations of dust emissions performed by using this model have been extensively compared with observations [ Marticorena et al , 1997a; Laurent et al , 2005; Laurent et al , 2008; Darmenova et al , 2009; Schmechtig et al , 2011].…”
Section: Dust Emission Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This dust emission amount lies within the computed dust emission range of 130–1600 Tg a −1 over North Africa from previous studies [ Engelstaedter et al , , and references therein]. The most recent assessments of the mean annual dust emission in North Africa are the following: 2077 Tg a −1 for 2006 estimated by Schmechtig et al [], 670 +/− 60 Tg a −1 for 1996–2001 by Laurent et al [], and 400–2200 Tg a −1 from the AeroCom model intercomparison for 2000 [ Huneeus et al , ]. Most dust aerosol from North Africa is emitted during northern hemisphere spring with 41%, followed by winter with 29%, summer with 20%, and fall with 10% of the annual emission flux.…”
Section: Nlljs‐generating Dust Emissionmentioning
confidence: 99%