2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.cpc.2007.02.043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulation of the packing of cohesive particles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is lower than the 56-54 vol.% expected for a random loose packing of cohesionless monodisperse spheres (defined as the loosest, mechanically stable packing state; Onoda and Liniger 1990;Ciamarra and Coniglio 2008;Zamponi 2008;Farrell et al 2010), and lower still than random loose packings achieved for 7 Page 20 of 25 polydisperse particles (Epstein and Young 1962;Jerram et al 2003). However, the efficiency of random loose packing depends on particle cohesion: for strongly cohesive particles, a stable distribution can be achieved at volume fractions <55% (Dong et al 2006;Yang et al 2007), and the presence of highly non-spherical, loose clustered chains of olivine will reduce this still further Jerram et al 2003). Random loose packing is also dependent on the viscosity of the liquid, with more open packings expected for particles in a viscous liquid (Delaney et al 2011).…”
Section: Formation Of the Fining-upwards Sequencementioning
confidence: 69%
“…This is lower than the 56-54 vol.% expected for a random loose packing of cohesionless monodisperse spheres (defined as the loosest, mechanically stable packing state; Onoda and Liniger 1990;Ciamarra and Coniglio 2008;Zamponi 2008;Farrell et al 2010), and lower still than random loose packings achieved for 7 Page 20 of 25 polydisperse particles (Epstein and Young 1962;Jerram et al 2003). However, the efficiency of random loose packing depends on particle cohesion: for strongly cohesive particles, a stable distribution can be achieved at volume fractions <55% (Dong et al 2006;Yang et al 2007), and the presence of highly non-spherical, loose clustered chains of olivine will reduce this still further Jerram et al 2003). Random loose packing is also dependent on the viscosity of the liquid, with more open packings expected for particles in a viscous liquid (Delaney et al 2011).…”
Section: Formation Of the Fining-upwards Sequencementioning
confidence: 69%
“…Therefore the force ratio is better than the Bond number in characterizing the piling behavior, as it includes the information of the local structure. The force ratio can be related to the porosity for the packing of cohesive particles as found in the previous studies [12,13]. Here, such a relationship still holds for the porosity of a pile, as shown in Fig.…”
Section: Force Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…For a granular system consisting of cohesive particles, normally the Bond number, which is the cohesive force between two particles to the weight of a particle, is used to characterize the effect of the cohesion on the properties on the system, such as the packing density, maximum angle of stability and flow rate [6,8,15]. However, it is found in the packing of cohesive particles, using the sum of the cohesive forces on a particle to its effective gravity is more appropriate [12,13]. In this work, the cohesive force is the capillary force, and then such a force ratio can be defined as:…”
Section: Force Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations