2014
DOI: 10.1088/0953-8984/26/11/115702
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulation of the phase diagram of magnetic vortices in two-dimensional superconductors: evidence for vortex chain formation

Abstract: We study the superconducting vortex states induced by the interplay of long-range Pearl repulsion and short-range intervortex attraction using Langevin dynamics simulation. We show that at low temperature the vortices form an ordered Abrikosov lattice both in low and high fields. The vortices show distinctive modulated structures at intermediate fields depending on the effective intervortex attraction: ordered vortex chain and Kogame-like vortex structures for weak attraction; bubble, stripe and antibubble lat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Let us take a more careful look at the similarities and differences between the calculated regular vortex patterns (see, e.g., [10,27,[35][36][37]) and the observed vortex patterns in multi-band superconductors [12,13,15]. The most prominent features that the numerical simulations reproduce are the formation of vortex clusters and vortex stripes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Let us take a more careful look at the similarities and differences between the calculated regular vortex patterns (see, e.g., [10,27,[35][36][37]) and the observed vortex patterns in multi-band superconductors [12,13,15]. The most prominent features that the numerical simulations reproduce are the formation of vortex clusters and vortex stripes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…A low-density clump phase, an intermediate density stripe phase, an anticlump phase, and a high-density uniform phase have been observed in simulations. (Dao et al, 2011;Drocco et al, 2013;Meng et al, 2014;Olson Reichhardt et al, 2010;Varney et al, 2013;Xu et al, 2011Xu et al, , 2014Zhao et al, 2012a,b) As vortices approach each other, the nonlinear effect becomes important such that the interaction between vortices may no longer be pairwise, i.e. many-body interaction such as three-body interaction becomes important.…”
Section: F Vortex With Nonmonotonic Interactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The long-range repulsion between vortices due to the dipolar interaction at large separation, the short-range Xu et al 2011, Zhao et al 2012a, 2012b, Drocco et al 2013, Varney et al 2013, Meng et al 2014, Xu et al 2014. As vortices approach each other, the nonlinear effect becomes important such that the interaction between vortices may no longer be pairwise, i.e.…”
Section: Vortex With Nonmonotonic Interactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…8,9 Being multi-component as a rule, such superconductors can support non-monotonic interactions between vortices, leading to nonuniform vortex patterns. [10][11][12] Leggett mode and phase solitons can arise as topological defects associated with non-trivial phase difference between different components. 13,14 Furthermore, in the state with TRSB, domain walls may separate areas with different TRSB ground states.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%