2022
DOI: 10.3390/rs14061494
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulation of the Radar Cross Section of a Noctuid Moth

Abstract: Electromagnetic modelling may be used as a tool for understanding the radar cross section (RCS) of volant animals. Here, we examine this emerging method in detail and delve deeper into the specifics of the modelling process for a single noctuid moth, with the hope of illuminating the importance of different aspects of the process by varying the morphometric and compositional properties of the model. This was accomplished by creating a high-fidelity three-dimensional insect model by micro-CT scanning a gold-pal… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Wings have discernible effects on radar reflections from animals (Addison et al, 2022), and wing‐flapping has noticeable signature in VLR, which is used for target classification (Rosa et al, 2016; Zaugg et al, 2008). We used WFF, average pulse width, average pulse length (hereafter together PP), and the pause rate (Figure 1) to describe wing‐flapping characteristics, and flight altitude, speed and radar cross section (RCS, related to target size, Chilson et al, 2017; O'mara et al, 2014; Mirkovic et al, 2016), which interact differently with wing‐flapping characteristics in birds and bats (Ellington, 1991; Grodzinski et al, 2009; Norberg & Rayner, 1987; Pennycuick, 2008).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wings have discernible effects on radar reflections from animals (Addison et al, 2022), and wing‐flapping has noticeable signature in VLR, which is used for target classification (Rosa et al, 2016; Zaugg et al, 2008). We used WFF, average pulse width, average pulse length (hereafter together PP), and the pause rate (Figure 1) to describe wing‐flapping characteristics, and flight altitude, speed and radar cross section (RCS, related to target size, Chilson et al, 2017; O'mara et al, 2014; Mirkovic et al, 2016), which interact differently with wing‐flapping characteristics in birds and bats (Ellington, 1991; Grodzinski et al, 2009; Norberg & Rayner, 1987; Pennycuick, 2008).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The key to retrieving the bird number is to build a function, i.e., obtaining the average RCS of birds. Bird average RCS can be estimated by means of simulation [15,17,18] or actual measurement [19] in a microwave darkroom, but it requires a lot of effort to build bird geometric models or acquire experimental data in a darkroom. In addition, the number of samples is limited, leading to a lack of representativeness.…”
Section: Bird Quantitative Observation Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The slight increasing MRD with the pitch angle may be caused by the insect legs. The effect of legs on insect RCS was verified through simulation in [34]. The positions of the legs are usually not symmetrical about the body in the experiment, and large components of the legs are not parallel to the body.…”
Section: ) Relationship Between Pitch Angle and Mrd Errormentioning
confidence: 99%