2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.nimb.2017.02.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulation of the time evolution of 1 MeV proton microbeam transmission through an insulating macrocapillary

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, a few experiments with a microbeam of 1 MeV protons [27][28][29] provided evidence of MeV-ion guiding as they showed clear charge-up processes together with a high transmission, which could not be achieved by the atomic scatterings. Recently, several theoretical simulations [30][31][32] reproduced those experimental results. The pioneering simulation by Nagy etal [30,31] adopted two-dimensional (2D) model, where the charge patch deflections and atomic scatterings were both considered.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, a few experiments with a microbeam of 1 MeV protons [27][28][29] provided evidence of MeV-ion guiding as they showed clear charge-up processes together with a high transmission, which could not be achieved by the atomic scatterings. Recently, several theoretical simulations [30][31][32] reproduced those experimental results. The pioneering simulation by Nagy etal [30,31] adopted two-dimensional (2D) model, where the charge patch deflections and atomic scatterings were both considered.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Recently, several theoretical simulations [30][31][32] reproduced those experimental results. The pioneering simulation by Nagy etal [30,31] adopted two-dimensional (2D) model, where the charge patch deflections and atomic scatterings were both considered. However, a three-dimensional (3D) model was used in our latest simulation [32], which only included the charge patch deflections.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Here we note that we used a focused, microsized beam, since it was expected that it is much easier to obtain an efficient transmission and thus it is easier to detect and characterize. Later we started the construction of a twodimensional computer simulation [20,21], which, despite its simplicity, well reproduced our experimental results and, even more, it was capable to give predictions for observables. Some of them were experimentally confirmed later [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…The blue dots are the simulated data points, while the red line is shown to guide the eye. over, this dominance is more pronounced at larger incident intensities, which is explained by the incident beam intensity dependence of the maximum achievable transmission: at larger incident beam intensity, the efficiency of transmission saturates at a higher value [20]. Inversely, in the case of lower incident current, the transmission saturates at a lower relative value due to the discharge and thus the weaker electric field of the formed charge patch.…”
Section: Spatial Distributions Of the Transmitted Beammentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This strongly suggests that the beam transmission was governed by a self-organizing charge-up process. The group performed a classical trajectory Monte-Carlo simulation for the 1°tilt case based on the selforganizing charge-up mechanism, which reproduced their experimental results well [110].…”
Section: Straight Capillaries With Mev Ionsmentioning
confidence: 78%