2000
DOI: 10.1007/s003710000069
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulation of three-dimensional cracks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This simplification gives the user control over the resulting crack patterns and decreases costs of the initial stress computation. Lastly, instead of moving the nodes during the simulation, such as in [27,13,8,19], our method keeps the nodes stationary and updates the stress field with a first-order quasi-static system.…”
Section: Stress Forces and The Separation Tensormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This simplification gives the user control over the resulting crack patterns and decreases costs of the initial stress computation. Lastly, instead of moving the nodes during the simulation, such as in [27,13,8,19], our method keeps the nodes stationary and updates the stress field with a first-order quasi-static system.…”
Section: Stress Forces and The Separation Tensormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A mass-spring system was used to reproduce crack patterns in microsphere monolayers [32], and to model tree bark [6], cracks in surfaces [12], and in volumes [13]. Gobron and Chiba used cellular automata to crack multi-layer surfaces [10] and simulate materials peeling off of surfaces [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a wide range of methods available for the deformation step, such as mass-spring networks [Norton et al 1991;Hirota et al 1998;Hirota et al 2000;Smith et al 2001;Levine et al 2014], finite element methods (FEM) [O'Brien and Hodgins 1999;Müller et al 2001;O'Brien et al 2002;Bao et al 2007;Wicke et al 2010;Zheng and James 2010;Koschier et al 2014] and extended FEM (X-FEM) Gravouil et al 2002;Abdelaziz and Hamouine 2008;Kaufmann et al 2009;Mousavi et al 2011], mesh-less or particle-based methods [Pauly et al 2005] such as the material point method (MPM) [Stomakhin et al 2013;Stomakhin et al 2014], and boundary element methods (BEM) [Aliabadi 1997;James and Pai 1999;Wilde and Aliabadi 1999;Frangi et al 2002;Sutradhar et al 2008;Kielhorn 2009;Messner and Schanz 2010;Sauter and Schwab 2011;Keeler and Bridson 2014].…”
Section: Deformationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is difficult to deal with changes to the material properties of the object or the environment. The second method performs simulations that take into consideration physical reasons that cause cracking to occur and reproduce cracking based on those results [6][7][8][9][10]. Although the computational costs are greater for this approach, cracking under various conditions can be reproduced relatively easily by changing physical parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%