2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ast.2020.105711
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulation of thrust control by fluidic injection and pintle in a solid rocket motor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[8] But this kind of using the secondary jet method to achieve variable thrust is not stable. Dongfeng Yan [9] proposed a variable thrust plan combining secondary jet and pintle in his article. This plan is not only stable, but also the addition of secondary jet to a certain extent to protect the pintle from ablation.…”
Section: Figure 1 Fourth Generation Ejection Seatmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…[8] But this kind of using the secondary jet method to achieve variable thrust is not stable. Dongfeng Yan [9] proposed a variable thrust plan combining secondary jet and pintle in his article. This plan is not only stable, but also the addition of secondary jet to a certain extent to protect the pintle from ablation.…”
Section: Figure 1 Fourth Generation Ejection Seatmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The combination of the two schemes solves two problems at the same time. The Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics' School of Astronautics team [9] conducted a dynamic response analysis of the dual pintle motor. They studied the electromagnetic subsystem, the pintle movement subsystem, the throttling subsystem, the combustion chamber pressure establishment subsystem, and the thrust subsystem.…”
Section: Figure 1 Fourth Generation Ejection Seatmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thrust vector control technologies commonly have two categories, namely, fluidic and mechanical vectoring controls [2]. Figures 1(a)-1(g) show seven representative fluidic control techniques employing a gas or liquid injection, involving coflow [3,4], counterflow [5][6][7][8], shock vector [9][10][11][12], bypass shock vector [13,14], throat shifting [15][16][17], dual throat nozzle [18,19], and bypass dual throat nozzle [20,21]. The above fluidic techniques have some outstanding advantages, for example, fast response, simple mechanical structure, and less thrust loss [10,11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figures 1(a)-1(g) show seven representative fluidic control techniques employing a gas or liquid injection, involving coflow [3,4], counterflow [5][6][7][8], shock vector [9][10][11][12], bypass shock vector [13,14], throat shifting [15][16][17], dual throat nozzle [18,19], and bypass dual throat nozzle [20,21]. The above fluidic techniques have some outstanding advantages, for example, fast response, simple mechanical structure, and less thrust loss [10,11]. However, some big storage tanks used to store and offer gas or liquid injectant and other assorted equipment increase the weight of the entire system remarkably.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%