2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2006.02.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulation of turbulent electrocoalescence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The only way to speed up the sedimentation process is to make small water droplets coalesce into larger ones [34]. analysis [28,[35][36][37][38].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The only way to speed up the sedimentation process is to make small water droplets coalesce into larger ones [34]. analysis [28,[35][36][37][38].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, their model was dependent on tuning parameter of slip length and some closure sub-models to consider the fluid state of drop. Later, Melheim and Chiesa [25] have modified a new model, the cluster integration method, whose validity is more doubtful. Bresciani et al [26] have studied droplet-droplet coalescence under the influence of an electric field through analytical solution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only averaged quantities are obtained, and models for the drag, mass‐transfer coefficients, and turbulence closures need to be provided. To model the turbulence, most simulations of the continuous phases have been based on Reynolds‐averaged Navier Stokes (RANS) equations34–36 and large eddy simulations (LES) 37–42. The literature concerning such macroscale approaches is extensive37, 43 and includes either Euler‐Euler or Euler‐Lagrangian methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%