2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.procs.2022.03.043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulation of Vehicles’ Gap Acceptance Decision at Unsignalized Intersections Using SUMO

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, accurate replication of traffic behavior models, such as gap acceptance, car following, lane changing, and so on, necessitates performing a calibration and validation process with the objective of minimizing the difference between simulated and observed outputs (28). There is rich literature focusing on assessing the impact of various design and operational alternatives using simulation models (3,19,(27)(28)(29)(30)(31). Leite et al (31) examined the performance of a roundabout under various operational conditions, such as changing the speed and acceleration within roundabouts as well as the minimum distance between vehicles, with the application of the SUMO simulation tool.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, accurate replication of traffic behavior models, such as gap acceptance, car following, lane changing, and so on, necessitates performing a calibration and validation process with the objective of minimizing the difference between simulated and observed outputs (28). There is rich literature focusing on assessing the impact of various design and operational alternatives using simulation models (3,19,(27)(28)(29)(30)(31). Leite et al (31) examined the performance of a roundabout under various operational conditions, such as changing the speed and acceleration within roundabouts as well as the minimum distance between vehicles, with the application of the SUMO simulation tool.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the probabilistic method takes into account the inconsistency and heterogeneity in the gap acceptance behavior of drivers in the minor stream and treats the critical gap as a random variable. There are different methods of calculating the critical gap in the literature, which includes Raff’s method, the clearing time method, the binary probit model, the maximum likelihood method, and so forth, as well as machine learning methods, such as the decision tree (DT), random forest (RF), support vector machine (SVM), and ANN methods ( 1327 ). For example, Sangole and Patil ( 21 ) applied an adaptive neuro-fuzzy interface system (ANFIS) to model drivers’ gap acceptance behavior at a limited priority T-intersection.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Otherwise, the speed must be adjusted (see [151], [152], [153], [154]). In contrast to gap acceptance models based on kinematic equations, there are also machine learning approaches (see [155], [156]).…”
Section: A Driver Behavior Modulesmentioning
confidence: 99%