2012
DOI: 10.2478/v10254-012-0010-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulation of Water-Entry and Water-Exit Problems Using a Moving Mesh Algorithm

Abstract: Abstract. Simulation of the water-entry and water-exit particularly, at the interface of two phases i.e. water and air due to the effect of flow-induced loads, gravity force and trapped air cushion presence is very complicated. This paper attempts to introduce a finite volume-based moving mesh algorithm in order to simulate such problems in a viscous incompressible two-phase medium. The algorithm employs a fractional step method to deal with the coupling between pressure and velocity fields. Interface is also … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several theoretical and numerical methods have been proposed to solve more general two dimensional water-entry problems. To indicate a few, these include similarity flow solutions for wedges by Shademani and Ghadimi [4] or Ghazizade and Nikseresht [5], matched asymptotic expansions by Armand and Cointe [6], nonlinear numerical methods by Greenhow [7] or Farsi and Ghadimi [8 and 9] or Yamada et al [10] or Luo et al [11], conformal mapping methods by Ghadimi et al [12] or Shah et al [13] and CFD techniques by Panahi [14] or Panciroli [15] or Piro and Maki [16]. It is difficult to obtain a fully nonlinear solution of the water-entry impact problem even in the regime of the potential flow theory.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several theoretical and numerical methods have been proposed to solve more general two dimensional water-entry problems. To indicate a few, these include similarity flow solutions for wedges by Shademani and Ghadimi [4] or Ghazizade and Nikseresht [5], matched asymptotic expansions by Armand and Cointe [6], nonlinear numerical methods by Greenhow [7] or Farsi and Ghadimi [8 and 9] or Yamada et al [10] or Luo et al [11], conformal mapping methods by Ghadimi et al [12] or Shah et al [13] and CFD techniques by Panahi [14] or Panciroli [15] or Piro and Maki [16]. It is difficult to obtain a fully nonlinear solution of the water-entry impact problem even in the regime of the potential flow theory.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is worth highlighting how, in the recent past, due to the increased computational power availability, many efforts have been devoted in defining models for the contemporary solution of both fluid and solid motion/deformation [19]. In naval application, this reflects always increasing attention to the analysis of impulsive loads due to slamming of rigid/deformable wedges/obstacles [20,21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, due to the increased availability of computational power, significant research efforts head towards the development of numerical methods that simultaneously model the fluid flow and the solid motion and deformation [35][36][37][38]. Such methodologies require the modeling of two non-overlapping domains, the fluid and the solid, separated by a common interface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the development of reliable numerical methods and experimental techniques to characterize such impulsive loading is crucial for the design of several kind of engineering devices, such as marine vessels and hydraulic structures. Several works are available in literature dealing with the simulation of fluid-structure interaction in the presence of a free surface [6,9,[35][36][37]. Different numerical models, alternative to Navier-Stokes, may be also employed to simulate the fluid flow with a free surface, such as Smoothed Particles Hydrodynamics (SPH) [54,55], Lattice Boltzmann Method (LBM) [8,56] and constrained interpolation profile (CIP) method [57,58].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%