2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.physa.2016.06.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulation study of interference of crossings pedestrian and vehicle traffic at a single lane roundabout

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Out of two, one deals with the empirical methodology based on the intersection geometry and the other depends purely on the gap acceptance process. Many researchers used a simulation approach to study the roundabout capacity [12][13][14][15][16]. The Indian standard document, referred to as Indian Roads Congress (IRC) [17], gives the formula for estimation of the entry capacity of the roundabout.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Out of two, one deals with the empirical methodology based on the intersection geometry and the other depends purely on the gap acceptance process. Many researchers used a simulation approach to study the roundabout capacity [12][13][14][15][16]. The Indian standard document, referred to as Indian Roads Congress (IRC) [17], gives the formula for estimation of the entry capacity of the roundabout.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The topics studied have included study road traffic dynamics in roundabouts [69], and the study of probability of road accidents [70,71]. The current publication focuses on developing a model for multi-lane roundabouts.…”
Section: Roundabout Cellular Automaton (Ca) Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Koh et al (2014) modeled the probability of violating using the various personal characteristics, situational and environment conditions with logistic regression. Moreover, pedestrian–vehicle interactions at a roundabout system were analyzed in the work of Echab et al (2016). In Shanghai (Ni et al, 2017), 1286 pedestrians were asked to rate their safety perception from 1 to 5.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%