2021
DOI: 10.1109/tns.2021.3074532
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulation Study on the Effect of Constant Hole Length of Curved Diverging Collimators for Radiation Monitoring Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The spatial resolution and image quality of a diverging collimator tend to deteriorate as the position of the radiation source being detected deviates from the center of the field of view (FOV) ( Cha et al, 2021 ). Consequently, we conducted additional assessments of the optimized diverging collimator to ascertain its performance across varying source positions ( Cha et al, 2021 ). Table 1 presents the geometric parameters of the optimized diverging collimator.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The spatial resolution and image quality of a diverging collimator tend to deteriorate as the position of the radiation source being detected deviates from the center of the field of view (FOV) ( Cha et al, 2021 ). Consequently, we conducted additional assessments of the optimized diverging collimator to ascertain its performance across varying source positions ( Cha et al, 2021 ). Table 1 presents the geometric parameters of the optimized diverging collimator.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the results of previous studies, we configured the parameters of the diverging collimator for the high-energy gamma imaging of Ir-192, which is used for brachytherapy in clinical practice, as follows [22]: as shown in figure 1(a), first, the distance (𝑠) between the source and detector surface was set to 50 cm; the height (ℎ) of the collimator, 30 mm; the focal length ( 𝑓 ), 60 mm; the hole size (𝑑), 0.5 mm; the septal thickness (𝑡), 0.3 mm; and the diverging angle, 45 • , considering the resolution and sensitivity performance of the collimator (table 1). Regarding the parameters of the pinhole collimator, the acceptance angle was set to 45 • and the hole diameter to 0.5 mm, and the distance between the source and detector surface was set to 50 cm to compare the performance with that of the diverging collimator (table 2).…”
Section: Performance Evaluation Of Collimatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%