2022
DOI: 10.1155/2022/6407452
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulation Study on the Impact Response of Barrels with Different Rifling Profiles during Bullet Engraving

Abstract: Gun barrel bores are prone to ablative damage and stress concentration under high temperatures, pressures, and dynamic load impacts during bullet engraving, which may result in barrel failure. A dynamic stress analysis during bullet engraving is a prerequisite for barrel life analysis and design. Impact responses during bullet engraving were investigated in this study for rifled barrels with different cross-sectional profiles to improve the match between the dynamic performances of the gun barrel and bullet an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 7 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In most above-mentioned simulation techniques, the chamber pressure curve obtained from firing tests or theoretical calculations is considered as the load applied to the projectile base, but in fact, the load should be calculated in real-time according to the dynamic response of the projectile. ABAQUS software provides a secondary development interface, VUAMP, to help users customize load amplitude [27][28][29][30][31][32] in every increment step and improve simulation accuracy.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In most above-mentioned simulation techniques, the chamber pressure curve obtained from firing tests or theoretical calculations is considered as the load applied to the projectile base, but in fact, the load should be calculated in real-time according to the dynamic response of the projectile. ABAQUS software provides a secondary development interface, VUAMP, to help users customize load amplitude [27][28][29][30][31][32] in every increment step and improve simulation accuracy.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%