Simulation Training Improves Medical Students’ Learning Experiences When Performing Real Vaginal Deliveries

Dayal, Ashlesha K.; Fisher, Nelli; Magrane, Diane; Goffman, Dena; Bernstein, Peter S.; Katz, Nadine T.

doi:10.1097/sih.0b013e3181b3e4ab

Cited by 85 publications

(64 citation statements)

References 8 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…7,11,13,14,16,18,21,41 However studies reporting obstetric emergency training were the most frequently reported highlighting the need to practice often infrequent complex emergencies in a simulated setting. Training covered umbilical cord prolapsed, 42 vaginal breech delivery, 21 pre-eclampsia, 31,43 PPH, 15,28,44 shoulder dystocia, 20,24,27,30,45 and combinations of the above.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 97%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Simulation based learning in midwifery education: A systematic review

et al. 2012

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 97%

“…2,[9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] Obstetricians, residents and medical students studying obstetric skills. [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] Team based studies (including obstetricians, residents, midwives, medical students, nurse anaesthetists; nurse midwives; auxiliaries). [26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35] Curricula approach…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Simulation based learning in midwifery education: A systematic review

et al. 2012

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…In other medical educational settings, simulations have been used successfully both in education and in testing. Five LOE 1 300 -304 and 10 LOE 2 [305][306][307][308][309][310][311][312][313][314] studies showed the benefit of using simulations as an educational tool. One LOE 1 study 315 showed the benefit of using simulation as an evaluative tool.…”

Section: Consensus On Sciencementioning

confidence: 99%

Part 13: First Aid

Markenson¹,

Ferguson²,

Chameides³

et al. 2010

Circulation

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The International First Aid Science Advisory Board identified 38 questions in first aid practice that had not been subjected to an evidence review process or that needed to be updated since the 2005 process. Two or more members of the International First Aid Science Advisory Board volunteered to independently review the scientific literature and complete an evidence-based review worksheet summarizing the literature (see Part 2 of this supplement for additional information). After the evidence was presented to the full board, a draft consensus summary of the scientific evidence and a draft consensus treatment recommendation were developed and represented at a subsequent meeting. Thus, each question, evidence-based review, draft summary of science, and draft treatment recommendation was presented and discussed on 2 separate occasions, and a Consensus on Science and Treatment Recommendation was reached by the Board. This document is a report of the group's consensus.As in 2005, the worksheets revealed the continuing paucity of scientific evidence to support specific first aid interventions. Very little research is being conducted in first aid, and most of the recommendations are extrapolations from research and experience in other medical venues, animal studies, and case series. It is hoped that this document will be a stimulus to future research in first aid. First Aid for Medical Emergencies SummaryThe medical questions addressed include poisoning, anaphylaxis, oxygen administration, and aspirin administration for a suspected coronary event.No changes were recommended for first aid management of acute poisoning.In reviewing epinephrine administration for anaphylaxis, evidence was found that laypeople and some medical and prehospital professionals are unable to recognize the signs and symptoms of anaphylaxis and therefore cannot, without training, make an independent decision to administer epinephrine with an auto-injector or to administer a second dose if the first is not effective. This issue takes on added importance in view of legislation in some jurisdictions that permits these actions.No evidence was found, except in decompression injuries, to support the routine administration of oxygen by first aid providers.The administration of aspirin to a victim experiencing chest discomfort is problematic. The literature is clear on the benefit of early administration of aspirin in an acute coronary event, except when there is a clear contraindication, such as aspirin allergy or a bleeding disorder. Less clear, however, is whether first aid providers can recognize the signs and symptoms of an acute Consensus on ScienceThere are no human studies on the effect of treating oral caustic exposure with dilution therapy. One in vitro LOE 5 chemistry study 2 demonstrated no benefit from the addition of large volumes of diluent to either a strong base or a strong acid. Five LOE 5 animal studies 3-7 demonstrated histological benefit to the esophagus when a diluent was administered following exposure to an alkali or acid. Treat...

show abstract

“…6,8,9 The resident, midwife, or attending physician who supervised the student completed the checklist as an evaluation of the student's performance. The evaluating preceptors were blinded to the stimulator type used by each student during their orientation training.…”

Section: Education Researchmentioning

confidence: 99%