2001
DOI: 10.1029/2001jd900051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulations of lightning optical waveforms as seen through clouds by satellites

Abstract: Abstract. We present three-dimensional simulations of photon transport through clouds, specifically designed to address the characteristics and detection of optical lightning waveforms collected by satellites. The model uses a Monte Carlo approach, in which discrete photons are advanced by a standard time step through a distribution of scattering water droplets, whose size and number density distributions are variable. The model is different from previous work, in that it considers both finite and infinite clo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
97
0
3

Year Published

2001
2001
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(107 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
7
97
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…7 in Kirkland et al, 2001). A typical slant range from the sensor to the cloud top within the field-of-view is ∼900 km, implying that the optical ERP at the cloud top corresponding to the trigger threshold is ∼ 3 × 10 8 W. We do not know what the peak power is at the actual source within the cloud, other than that it is brighter; all that matters is the cloud-top ERP (Koshak et al, 1994;Light et al, 2001b). Relative to the triggerthreshold irradiance of 3 × 10 −5 W m −2 , PDD recorded a broad distribution of events distributed upward in irradiance to > 3 × 10 −4 W m −2 .…”
Section: A Direct Test Of the Optical Output Of Narrow Bipolar Eventsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…7 in Kirkland et al, 2001). A typical slant range from the sensor to the cloud top within the field-of-view is ∼900 km, implying that the optical ERP at the cloud top corresponding to the trigger threshold is ∼ 3 × 10 8 W. We do not know what the peak power is at the actual source within the cloud, other than that it is brighter; all that matters is the cloud-top ERP (Koshak et al, 1994;Light et al, 2001b). Relative to the triggerthreshold irradiance of 3 × 10 −5 W m −2 , PDD recorded a broad distribution of events distributed upward in irradiance to > 3 × 10 −4 W m −2 .…”
Section: A Direct Test Of the Optical Output Of Narrow Bipolar Eventsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is a physical delay for an electrical transient to develop into a region where the emitted photons have a higher chance of being seen by a satellite. On the other hand, the "propagation delay" is due to the diffusion of light outward through intervening cloud before reaching the cloud surface (Koshak et al, 1994;Light et al, 2001b). Each of these types of delay in turn has great variability, so the distribution of sferic-minus-light time differences is not only grossly displaced, but also broadened.…”
Section: A Direct Test Of the Optical Output Of Narrow Bipolar Eventsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The measured optical signal's delay (relative to the VHF signal) has previously been shown to consist of two additive contributions (Light and Hamlin, 2008;Suszcynsky et al, 2000): First, there is a "scattering" delay (of the light relative to the VHF) due to the multiple Mie scatterings during transport through the cloud to the cloud's top, where the light can be seen from orbit (Koshak et al, 1994;Light et al, 2001b). For an ensemble containing hundreds of examples of joint radio and optical recordings, the temporal broadening due to scattering was estimated as 138 µs (see Fig.…”
Section: Using Humr As Primary Receiver: Radio-optical Temporal Relatmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As noted by Russell (2011), a low circular polar orbit is desirable for radar mapping, and a modest lightning instrument would be a valuable but relatively inexpensive augmentation to a radar mapping mission. We may note that such combined optical and RF surveys of lighting (e.g., Light et al 2001) at Earth have been performed on a rather small satellite platform (e.g., FORTE, 210 kg, flown in 1997).…”
Section: Conclusion and Recommendations For Future Surveysmentioning
confidence: 99%