2006
DOI: 10.1143/jjap.45.2481
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulations of Mask Error Enhancement Factor in 193 nm Immersion Lithography

Abstract: An accurate method for measuring defocus, which is an application of phase shifting mask technology for higher resolution microlithography, reveals the impacts of reticle topography on optical microlithography. On the topographic reticles, there exist many focus monitors besides overlay marks. These reticles include almost flat and convex to concave topography with a maximum altitude difference of 2 m. Contrary to our expectation, the experimental results showed that reticle topography has little impact on the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Generally speaking, image contrast 13,14 and the mask error enhancement factor 15 ͑MEEF͒ are used as the metrics to analyze the layout "quality." In this work, several throughpitch, line-to-tip, and tip-to-tip patterns are used for calculating the image contrast and the MEEF.…”
Section: Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally speaking, image contrast 13,14 and the mask error enhancement factor 15 ͑MEEF͒ are used as the metrics to analyze the layout "quality." In this work, several throughpitch, line-to-tip, and tip-to-tip patterns are used for calculating the image contrast and the MEEF.…”
Section: Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mask bias and attenuated background transmission have been widely studied in reticle optimization, with much effort devoted to the research of image log slope ͑ILS͒ and mask error enhancement factor ͑MEEF͒ through simulations, [8][9][10] theoretical approaches, 11,12 and matrix analysis. 13,14 While the capabilities of Hi-T reticle designs are clear, the concise form and explicit relations are rarely found in the literature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A normalized image log slope (NILS) has been used to evaluate the quality of pattern and susceptibility of the hotspot pattern to focus and exposure errors. The mask enhanced error factor (MEEF) for the dense pitch in general is higher than for isolated, and the higher MEEF causes lower NILS [11], [12] i.e., the lower the NILS in the dense pitch, the higher the probability of a bridging hotspot. As a result, the use of density filters may improve the detection accuracy of bridging hotspots.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%