2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2018.05.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulations of shock wave/turbulent boundary layer interaction with upstream micro vortex generators

Abstract: The streamwise breathing motion of the separation bubble, triggered by the shock wave/boundary layer interaction (SBLI) at large Mach number, is known to yield wall pressure and aerodynamic load fluctuations. Following the experiments by Wang et al. (2012), we aim to evaluate and understand how the introduction of microramp vortex generators (mVGs) upstream the interaction may reduce the amplitude of these fluctuations. We first perform a reference large-eddy simulation (LES) of the canonical situation when th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(40 reference statements)
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An explicit third-order Runge-Kutta (RK3) scheme is used for time integration with the Vreman subgrid-scale (SGS) model (Vreman, 2004). The approach relies on the combination of a HFF 32,4 low-dissipative centred numerical scheme and an essentially non-oscillatory (ENO) secondorder shock-capturing scheme, with a shock sensor (Grebert et al, 2018). The numerical domain reproduces the ISAE-Supaero wind tunnel test section geometry with an axial dimension corresponding to 20 chords of the airfoil (the airfoil is located at the centre of the domain).…”
Section: Large-eddy Simulation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An explicit third-order Runge-Kutta (RK3) scheme is used for time integration with the Vreman subgrid-scale (SGS) model (Vreman, 2004). The approach relies on the combination of a HFF 32,4 low-dissipative centred numerical scheme and an essentially non-oscillatory (ENO) secondorder shock-capturing scheme, with a shock sensor (Grebert et al, 2018). The numerical domain reproduces the ISAE-Supaero wind tunnel test section geometry with an axial dimension corresponding to 20 chords of the airfoil (the airfoil is located at the centre of the domain).…”
Section: Large-eddy Simulation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An MR of the height of 0.47 times the freestream boundary layer thickness has been placed before the shock impingement point. 24 Results showed a reduction of separation bubble and pressure load fluctuation. Similarly, reductions in the separation zone and shape factor have been reported by Yan et al 25 in his study by implementing the MR-type VGs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The steady base flow is obtained with the numerical solver IC3, a high-order compact compressible code developed at ISAE-SUPAERO [20,21]. IC3 is a parallel finite-volume-based code with explicit Runge-Kutta (RK) scheme for time integration.…”
Section: B Base State Computationmentioning
confidence: 99%