2021
DOI: 10.3390/jmse9111311
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulations of the Concentration Fields of Rosette-Type Multiport Buoyant Discharges Using Combined CFD and Multigene Genetic Programming Techniques

Abstract: Rosette-type diffusers are becoming popular nowadays for discharging wastewater effluents. Effluents are known as buoyant jets if they have a lower density than the receiving water, and they are often used for municipal and desalination purposes. These buoyant effluents discharged from rosette-type diffusers are known as rosette-type multiport buoyant discharges. Investigating the mixing properties of these effluents is important for environmental impact assessment and optimal design of the diffusers. Due to t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To the authors' knowledge, no other studies have attempted to predict the concentration field of multiple vertical buoyant effluents using a DL approach. The research group has previously predicted key parameters in the process of effluent mixing and spatial distribution of variables in other problems using genetic programming (GP) and multi‐gene genetic programming (MGGP; Yan, Mohammadian, et al., 2021; Yan, Wang, et al., 2021). However, a preliminary test for this study showed that the RF approach significantly outperformed MGGP in both model accuracy and efficiency.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To the authors' knowledge, no other studies have attempted to predict the concentration field of multiple vertical buoyant effluents using a DL approach. The research group has previously predicted key parameters in the process of effluent mixing and spatial distribution of variables in other problems using genetic programming (GP) and multi‐gene genetic programming (MGGP; Yan, Mohammadian, et al., 2021; Yan, Wang, et al., 2021). However, a preliminary test for this study showed that the RF approach significantly outperformed MGGP in both model accuracy and efficiency.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Modeling effluent mixing and transport using fully 3D CFD models is becoming mainstream in recent years. For instance, CFD models have been developed for the determination of mixing brine discharges (Didier, 2004;George et al, 2003), seawater desalination discharge in limited disposal areas (Abou-Elhaggag et al, 2011), mixing and dispersion of marine discharges (Robinson et al, 2014), inclined dense jets (Kheirkhah Gildeh et al, 2015), jets subjected to lateral confinement (Yan & Mohammadian, 2017), solvent dispersion in porous media (Peyman et al, 2018), multiple vertical buoyant jets (Yan et al, 2020), inclined dense jets (Gildeh et al, 2021a(Gildeh et al, , 2021b, rosette-shaped multi-port buoyant jets (Yan, Wang, et al, 2021), and the results demonstrated the excellent predictive capability of these models. However, modeling effluent mixing and transport using fully 3D models is very computationally expensive and requires extensive computing resources, especially for the processes in large-scale water bodies.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The output feature was the normalized concentration. The MGGP algorithm was performed using a modified MATLAB script GPTIPS2 [46,66]. The population was set as 500.…”
Section: Multigene Genetic Programming (Mggp)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ML-based surrogate models have been successfully established to predict the flow field of a curved open-channel flow [43], density-driven solute transport [44], the spatial distribution of flow depth in fluvial systems [45], etc. In recent years, datadriven models based on ML algorithms have also been proposed for effluent-driven solute transport [30,33,46], but none of them have considered the Coriolis effect. Furthermore, most of these studies on water effluents only predicted certain characteristic parameters instead of the complete concentration fields [30,33] or reconstructed the concentration fields by combining pointwise data instead of directly reproducing the concentration fields [46].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation