2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.compfluid.2014.03.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulations of zigzag maneuvers for a container ship with direct moving rudder and propeller

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
34
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, in order to capture the characteristic spatial and time scales of the flow around the propeller blades, the typical time step should be at least two orders of magnitude lower than the one typically adopted for the same simulation with the effect of the propeller modeled by, e.g., an actuator disk model; in addition, the mesh size close to the propeller and in the near wake may be properly refined. A very limited number of this kind of simulation is documented in the open literature, both for the straight ahead condition as well as in free motion in waves or maneuvering (Muscari et al, 2011;Castro et al, 2011;Mofidi and Carrica, 2014;Carrica et al, 2012;Sadat-Hosseini et al, 2011). Moreover, it has to be stressed that, although the propeller loads (hub or blade loads) were computed, the validation process was not complete, because only thrust and torque (when available) were measured during model tests.…”
Section: Background and Motivationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, in order to capture the characteristic spatial and time scales of the flow around the propeller blades, the typical time step should be at least two orders of magnitude lower than the one typically adopted for the same simulation with the effect of the propeller modeled by, e.g., an actuator disk model; in addition, the mesh size close to the propeller and in the near wake may be properly refined. A very limited number of this kind of simulation is documented in the open literature, both for the straight ahead condition as well as in free motion in waves or maneuvering (Muscari et al, 2011;Castro et al, 2011;Mofidi and Carrica, 2014;Carrica et al, 2012;Sadat-Hosseini et al, 2011). Moreover, it has to be stressed that, although the propeller loads (hub or blade loads) were computed, the validation process was not complete, because only thrust and torque (when available) were measured during model tests.…”
Section: Background and Motivationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This results in a zigzag response that is used to assess the maneuverability of the vehicle. The maximum rudder angle and the check heading angle characterize the maneuver type; for instance, a 20/10 zigzag maneuver turns the rudders to 20 ∘ and changes direction when the check heading angle of 10 ∘ is reached [27][28][29]. For ZFAUV, the direction is controlled by tunnel thruster or differential control of tail thrusters; behind, tunnel thruster or differential control of tail thrusters is replaced by 'rudder' .…”
Section: Zigzag Maneuvermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first is a fully CFD-based approach that simulates standard manoeuvres with a steering rudder and rotating propeller. Mofidi and Carrica [4] presented a direct simulation of a zigzag manoeuvre for the KRISO Container Ship (KCS)in calm water. Shen et al [5] implemented a dynamic overset grid technique using the open-source code OpenFOAM and presented free-running manoeuvring simulations for a KCS ship in calm water.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%