2014
DOI: 10.3182/20140824-6-za-1003.00773
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simultaneous Adaptation of the Process and Measurement Noise Covariances for the UKF Applied to Nanosatellite Attitude Estimation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The main advantage of the UKF is that it does not use any linearization for calculating the state predictions and covariances. Many robust UKF variants have been proposed [30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40]. For instance, the H ∞ performance criterion has been combined with the UKF to improve the robustness against model errors and noise uncertainty in [30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The main advantage of the UKF is that it does not use any linearization for calculating the state predictions and covariances. Many robust UKF variants have been proposed [30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40]. For instance, the H ∞ performance criterion has been combined with the UKF to improve the robustness against model errors and noise uncertainty in [30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [40], the fading factor is adopted to reduce the effect of the dynamics model errors and a robust estimation strategy is introduced to suppress the measurement model errors. Although the effect of the dynamic model error and the measurement error can be reduced simultaneously, the process and the measurement noise should be Gaussian distributions with known covariance matrices [37][38][39][40].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…At the predication step, the innovation is the difference between the actual measurement and its predicted value. On the other hand, the residual is the difference between actual measurement and its estimated value using the information available at step k. When both the R k and Q k matrices are estimated based on the innovation or residual covariance, Q k must be estimated assuming full knowledge of the R k and vice versa [238]. To run the Q k and R k at the same time when we have high uncertainties in both matrices, the Q k adaptation method presented here estimates the Q k matrix based on the innovation covariance, and the adaptation method for the R k matrix is a residual covariance-based scaling method.…”
Section: Adaptation Of State and Measurement Covariance Matricesmentioning
confidence: 99%