1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0149-7634(97)00025-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simultaneous comparison of cerebral dialysis and push–pull perfusion in the brain of rats: a critical review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
45
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 187 publications
0
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These experimental techniques provided the same conclusions but, remarkably, the BP ND s measured in the caudate putamen with the b-microprobes were smaller than the BP ND s measured with small-animal PET. Such a large discrepancy between b-microprobe BP ND s and smallanimal PET BP ND s has been described in the literature and can be attributed to changes in the permeability of the blood-brain barrier, blood flow, or local metabolism caused by probe implantation (23,32). We anticipate, however, that this is caused by the low sensitivity of the b-microprobe, which results in count rates barely above the background level because we kept the injected mass dose at around 3 nmol/kg (33) to ensure the same tracer concentrations as in the PET experiment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…These experimental techniques provided the same conclusions but, remarkably, the BP ND s measured in the caudate putamen with the b-microprobes were smaller than the BP ND s measured with small-animal PET. Such a large discrepancy between b-microprobe BP ND s and smallanimal PET BP ND s has been described in the literature and can be attributed to changes in the permeability of the blood-brain barrier, blood flow, or local metabolism caused by probe implantation (23,32). We anticipate, however, that this is caused by the low sensitivity of the b-microprobe, which results in count rates barely above the background level because we kept the injected mass dose at around 3 nmol/kg (33) to ensure the same tracer concentrations as in the PET experiment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…According to Myers, Adell, and Lankford (1998), several sampling techniques had been developed to collect brain ECF from the cerebral ventricles prior to the development of the push-pull perfusion technique, which overcomes the problem of morphological imprecision and difficulties to access neuronal systems. Since the development of push-pull systems for perfusion of anatomically distinct regions of the brain of living animal, the main topics that have been discussed are the recovery of substances, the infusion of drugs through the cannula, and the consequent tissue damage that occurs at the sample region.…”
Section: Push-pull Perfusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, in view of the greater extent of tissue damage that occurs near the sampled region, because of the size of the cannula and the flow at the tip, push-pull perfusion sampling has become a less favorable and less competitive technique since the development of microdialysis sampling (Kottegoda, Shaik, & Shippy, 2002). Additionally, push-pull techniques are also suspected of altering the transporter mechanism, uptake process, or other synaptic processes as a result of direct contact of the artificial CSF with the cells, that perturbing the milieu of the extracellular environment (Myers, Adell, & Lankford, 1998;Kennedy, Thompson, & Vickroy, 2002;Kottegoda, Shaik, & Shippy, 2002), especially when the flow rates in the push and pull tubes are not balanced precisely.…”
Section: Push-pull Perfusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, the size of lesions due to the fluid infusion with microdialysis method is smaller as only 2 μl/min of CSF is perfused with the microdialysis method, whereas 15-22 μl/min of CSF is perfused with the push-pull perfusion method. However, a comprehensive study by Myers and colleagues indicates that sizes of histological lesions by both methods are essentially comparable (Myers et al 1998).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The microdialysis method employs a semi-permeable membrane attached to the end of two cannulae (inlet and outlet) allowing biochemical substances to enter samples by concentration equilibrium across the membrane placed in the base of the hypothalamus, while aCSF is slowly perfused by a pump. Although both approaches are very powerful, each has strengths and weaknesses (Levine et al, 1994;Terasawa, 1994;Robinson, 1995;Myers et al, 1998).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%