2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.sysconle.2014.08.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simultaneous compensation of input and state delays for nonlinear systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The stability proof is based on an equivalent representation of plant (1), using transport PDEs for the actuator states, and on an equivalent PDE representation of the predictor states (3)- (5). We present the alternative representations for the plant and the predictor states before stating and proving the main result of this section, since the reader might find the alternative formalisms helpful in better digesting the design and analysis ideas of our methodology.…”
Section: Assumptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The stability proof is based on an equivalent representation of plant (1), using transport PDEs for the actuator states, and on an equivalent PDE representation of the predictor states (3)- (5). We present the alternative representations for the plant and the predictor states before stating and proving the main result of this section, since the reader might find the alternative formalisms helpful in better digesting the design and analysis ideas of our methodology.…”
Section: Assumptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…a) Background and Motivation: Despite the recent outburst in the development of predictor-based control laws for nonlinear systems with input delays [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [26], [27], [28], [29], [30], [31], [32], [35], [36], [37], [42], [43], [44], [45], [46], the problem of the systematic predictor-feedback stabilization of multi-input nonlinear systems with, potentially different, in each individual input channel, long input delays, has remained, heretofore, untackled, although the problem was solved in the linear case in the early 1980s [4] (see also [41]). In this article, we address the problem of stabilization of multi-input nonlinear systems with distinct input delays of arbitrary length and develop a nonlinear version of the prediction-based control laws developed in [4] and recently in [53], [54] for the compensation of input delays in multi-input linear systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(5) and the constant mismatch in the inertia matrix of the spacecraft, simultaneously. All simulation parameters are selected the same as the first simulation except the actual time delay, which is assumed here to be τ = 634 ms.…”
Section: Uncertainty Scenariomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally speaking, these works can be divided into three categories. The first class of the control algorithms is utilized predictor-based feedback control law to compensate delay effects (see, for example [5,6,13,[24][25][26]). This method is essentially a nonlinear version of the Smith predictor [25] which was extended to nonlinear systems in [25] by Krstic. In the second group of control algorithms, the controller is firstly designed by neglecting delay.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although in recent years the control problem of SISO nonlinear systems with input delay is frequently considered, such as Bekiaris-Liberis (2014) and Khazaee et al (2015), a few studies have been performed in the field of interconnected systems with input delays (Bakule et al, 2016; Zhu et al, 2010). Bakule et al (2016) designed an LMI-based decentralized H state feedbback controller for linear interconnected systems with uncertainties and input delays.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%