2019
DOI: 10.1038/s41591-019-0650-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simultaneous detection of genotype and phenotype enables rapid and accurate antibiotic susceptibility determination

Abstract: Multidrug resistant organisms (MDROs) are a serious threat to human health 1,2. Fast, accurate antibiotic susceptibility testing (AST) is a critical need in addressing escalating antibiotic resistance, since delays in identifying MDROs increase mortality 3,4 and use of broad-spectrum antibiotics, further selecting for resistant organisms. Yet current growth-based AST assays, such as broth microdilution 5 , require several days before informing key clinical decisions. Rapid AST would transform the care of infec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
84
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
4
84
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is also important to note that we limited our review to ML algorithms trained on clinical (patients' characteristics and recorded clinical features) and laboratory data (phenotypical identification and susceptibility test) usually available in routine clinical practice in most hospitals. In this regard, the possible dissemination and appropriate use of innovative tests able to provide information on either the precise mechanisms of resistance or other phenotypic/genotypic features of MDR-GNB may further and considerably improve the ability of ML algorithms to help clinicians predicting MDR-GNB risks in routine care [32,33]. Very importantly, this should occur against a background of wide adherence to the FAIR principles (findable, accessible, interoperable, and reusable) connected to the availability of standardized systems [34][35][36][37][38].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also important to note that we limited our review to ML algorithms trained on clinical (patients' characteristics and recorded clinical features) and laboratory data (phenotypical identification and susceptibility test) usually available in routine clinical practice in most hospitals. In this regard, the possible dissemination and appropriate use of innovative tests able to provide information on either the precise mechanisms of resistance or other phenotypic/genotypic features of MDR-GNB may further and considerably improve the ability of ML algorithms to help clinicians predicting MDR-GNB risks in routine care [32,33]. Very importantly, this should occur against a background of wide adherence to the FAIR principles (findable, accessible, interoperable, and reusable) connected to the availability of standardized systems [34][35][36][37][38].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, under the general assumption that novel resistance variants are more likely to appear in underrepresented lineages, phylogeny-aware surveillance could be paired with a diagnostic approach such as genomic neighbor typing 56 , where any isolates with either susceptible or low confidence calls that appear to be divergent from the genomes in the reference database would be prioritized for confirmatory phenotyping. Similarly, a diagnostic that predicts AMR phenotypes through a combination of transcriptomic and genomic typing 63 may facilitate targeted surveillance by identifying isolates with ambiguous predictions ( e.g. , isolates with transcriptional signatures of resistance that lack known genomic markers of resistance) that could be prioritized for confirmatory phenotyping.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We note that many stateof-the-art phenotypic AST methods are initially published without validation of performance directly on clinical samples, e.g. a recent breakthrough demonstrating phenotypic AST on isolates and on blood cultures [58]. Urine is a relevant matrix for a CRE diagnostic because UTIs are the most common source of CRE isolates [76], and because of the large number of hospital-acquired infections that involve catheters or other long-term indwelling medical devices [11], where CRE infections cause major problems.…”
Section: Plos Biologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rapid phenotypic methods based on quantification of nucleic acids (NAs) have shown great promise for a rapid POC AST due to the speed, specificity, and robustness of NA detection [53][54][55][56][57][58]. There is an additional advantage to using NA quantification as a readout of the bacterial response to antibiotic: because rapid pathogen ID from clinical samples is commonly performed via NA analysis, it would likely be easier to integrate an NA-based phenotypic AST into a combined ID/AST workflow performed from the same clinical sample.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%