2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2009.12.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simultaneous determination of quinolones for veterinary use by high-performance liquid chromatography with electrochemical detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are numerous studies and reviews about the determination of FQs in animal tissues , eggs , and bovine milk , but the number of studies about FQs in porcine plasma or serum is quite small. In general, FQs determination has been made by LC and CE .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are numerous studies and reviews about the determination of FQs in animal tissues , eggs , and bovine milk , but the number of studies about FQs in porcine plasma or serum is quite small. In general, FQs determination has been made by LC and CE .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, governmental agencies have set limitations on the acceptable levels of OFLX residues. Several traditional methods for the detection of OFLX residues, such as spectrophotometry, high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), capillary electrophoresis, and microbiological assay, are well-proven and widely accepted, but these methods are often viewed as laborious and time intensive for sample pretreatment. Moreover, implementation of these methods involves a significant investment in equipment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sarafloxacin (SARA) is a fluoroquinolone (FQ) antibacterial agent that is used for the control of early mortality in growing turkeys and broiler chickens (Codex of Federal Regulations, 1997). SARA is the first FQ approved in the United States for use in food‐producing animals, but was recently withdrawn from the market owing to concerns about microbial resistance (Chu et al ., 2002; Rodríguez Cáceres et al ., 2010). In the Republic of Korea, SARA is not currently registered, but its maximum residue limits (MRLs) were established as 10–80 µg/kg for poultry by the Korea Food and Drug Administration (KFDA).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The KFDA was tasked with developing a regulatory residue method for SARA in chicken and pig muscles. A variety of methods for the simultaneous determination of the FQs, including SARA, in pig or chicken muscles have been reported on the basis of liquid chromatography with fluorometric (Rose et al ., 1998; Holtzapple et al ., 1999; Posyniak et al ., 1999; Yorke and Froc, 2000; Ramos et al ., 2003; Schneider et al ., 2007), ultraviolet (Barrón et al ., 2002; Hermo et al ., 2005; Christodoulou et al ., 2007; Tsai et al ., 2009), electrochemical (Rodríguez Cáceres et al ., 2010) or mass spectrometric detection (Schneider and Donoghue, 2002; Bailac et al ., 2006; Clemente et al ., 2006; Kaufmann et al ., 2008). In these previous studies, non‐routine sample preparation techniques including immunoaffinity (Holtzapple et al ., 1999), microwave (Hermo et al ., 2005), dispersive extraction (Tsai et al ., 2009) and capillary electrophoresis chromatographic separation (Barrón et al ., 2002) have been applied, but their regular use is rather limited, owing to their non‐routine nature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation