1990
DOI: 10.1002/jps.2600791211
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simultaneous Determination of Sulfasalazine and Its Metabolites Sulfapyridine and N-Acetylsulfapyridine in Human Serum by Ion-Pair High-Performance Liquid Chromatography Using a Polymer-Based Column

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, to the lower diclofenac bioavailability from the CD prodrug, sulfapyridine was completely absorbed from its prodrug as shown by the similar AUCs (59.4 µg.h/mL of the prodrug vs 61.8 µg.h/mL of the free compound). This reflects previous reports of high absorption of sulfapyridine following administration of sulfasalazine (Azad Khan and Truelove, 1980;Buggé et al, 1990). The difference in in vivo bioavailabilities of diclofenac and sulfapyridine from their prodrugs correlates with ex vivo studies which showed a much slower rate of release of diclofenac from diclofenac-β-cyclodextrin compared to the very fast release of sulfapyridine from sulfasalazine (Vieira et al, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…In contrast, to the lower diclofenac bioavailability from the CD prodrug, sulfapyridine was completely absorbed from its prodrug as shown by the similar AUCs (59.4 µg.h/mL of the prodrug vs 61.8 µg.h/mL of the free compound). This reflects previous reports of high absorption of sulfapyridine following administration of sulfasalazine (Azad Khan and Truelove, 1980;Buggé et al, 1990). The difference in in vivo bioavailabilities of diclofenac and sulfapyridine from their prodrugs correlates with ex vivo studies which showed a much slower rate of release of diclofenac from diclofenac-β-cyclodextrin compared to the very fast release of sulfapyridine from sulfasalazine (Vieira et al, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The International Conference on Harmonization (ICH), through its guidelines Q1A (R2) and Q1B [10, 11], requires the conduct of forced degradation studies to characterize all of the possible degradation products under varied conditions such as light, heat, humidity, acid/base hydrolysis, and oxidation in order to develop a stability-indicating assay method (SIAM) for the stability testing of a drug substance or product. An extensive literature search has revealed that several analytical methods were reported in the 1990s for the analysis of SSZ alone [12, 13], in the formulations [14], and in the presence of metabolites [1521]. Peel et al, 1994 [22] and Coward et al, 1995 [23] had reported interference of SSZ with the HPLC assay of urine and 5-hydroxyindole-3-acetic acid, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several analyses using high‐performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) have been reported for SLP, Ac‐SLP, 5‐ASA and acetyl 5‐ASA (8–11). However, the determination of drugs in serum and plasma using HPLC normally requires several sample preparation processes, such as filtration, deproteinization, extraction, centrifugation, and concentration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%