2017
DOI: 10.3390/app7121210
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simultaneous Dual-Arm Motion Planning for Minimizing Operation Time

Abstract: Dual-arm robots are expected to perform work in a dynamic environment. One of the most basic tasks that a dual-arm robot does is pick-and-place work. However, this work is more complicated when there are several objects in the robot's workspace. Additionally, it is likely to take a long time to finish the work as the number of objects increases. Therefore, we propose a method using a combination of two approaches to achieve efficient pick-and-place performance by a dual-arm robot to minimize its operation time… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, different assignments of sub-tasks to arms, while taking the individual working ranges into account as well as task steps in which the arms have to cooperate, lead to a further combinatorial complexity. The assembly planning problem was addressed in the literature via different methods, including prioritized TAMP ( Kurosu et al, 2017 ), fixed-path planning ( O’Donnell and Lozano-Pérez, 1989 ), and fixed-roadmap planning. For this paper, we analyze the latter approach, which uses a flexible model and solver for simultaneous task allocation and motion scheduling that is based on constraint programming (CP) and constraint optimization ( Behrens et al, 2019a ).…”
Section: Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, different assignments of sub-tasks to arms, while taking the individual working ranges into account as well as task steps in which the arms have to cooperate, lead to a further combinatorial complexity. The assembly planning problem was addressed in the literature via different methods, including prioritized TAMP ( Kurosu et al, 2017 ), fixed-path planning ( O’Donnell and Lozano-Pérez, 1989 ), and fixed-roadmap planning. For this paper, we analyze the latter approach, which uses a flexible model and solver for simultaneous task allocation and motion scheduling that is based on constraint programming (CP) and constraint optimization ( Behrens et al, 2019a ).…”
Section: Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LaValle [17] formulates the motion scheduling problem in a joint configuration space. Prioritized planning assigns an order to the robots (arms) according to which their movements are planned (e.g., [15]). In fixed-path planning -also referred to as time-scaling -only timings are adjusted to prevent collisions [23].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conversely, we create dense roadmaps to enable the close coordination of arms, thus allow more parallel movements of arms. Kurosu et al [15] describe a decoupled MILP-based approach to solve a STAAMS, where the motion planner is prone to fail due to simplified motion and cost models used in the one-shot MILP formulation. This is not the case for us, as a single CP solver finds a mutually feasible solution for all sub-problems.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During this process, it must be ensured that the manipulator does not collide with any obstacle in the workspace or itself. Existing motion planning algorithms include rapidly random-exploring tree (RRT) [12][13][14][15], probabilistic roadmap method (PRM) [16,17], A* [18], neural network [19], and artificial potential field (APF) [20][21][22][23]. RRT is the most popular algorithm among scientists all over the world to process motion planning problems, and the related algorithms include RRT*, Informed-RRT, RRT-Connect, and so on.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%