2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2010.02.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simultaneous electrochemical determination of dopamine and acetaminophen using multiwall carbon nanotubes modified glassy carbon electrode

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
92
1
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 287 publications
(102 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
6
92
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…These effects have mainly been attributed to their great surfaces for adsorption, an improvement in electron transfer and the presence of impurities such as Fe, among others. In this context, many works related to CNT-based electrochemical sensors for bioanalytical applications have been published, finding use in clinical chemistry, food quality and control, drug analysis, waste water treatment and bioprocessing [3][4][5] . Despite all of the electroanalytical advantages from CNTs, a major experimental drawback is their insolubility in all solvents, which makes their use as surface electrode modifiers difficult.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These effects have mainly been attributed to their great surfaces for adsorption, an improvement in electron transfer and the presence of impurities such as Fe, among others. In this context, many works related to CNT-based electrochemical sensors for bioanalytical applications have been published, finding use in clinical chemistry, food quality and control, drug analysis, waste water treatment and bioprocessing [3][4][5] . Despite all of the electroanalytical advantages from CNTs, a major experimental drawback is their insolubility in all solvents, which makes their use as surface electrode modifiers difficult.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was easily seen that the R ct of these electrodes was in a sequence of: bare GCE < En/PGA/GCE < PGA/GCE < DNA/En/PGA/ GCE ( Figure 2, curve a-d). This is because the positive charge of amino group on the En/PGA/GCE surface was benefit for Fe(CN) 6 3À/4À anions enrichment. It was easier for electron transfer compared to the PGA/GCE, which was negatively charged on the surface.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1) was used for such voltammograms whose ∆Ep values are greater than 10 mV [42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49] ∆Ep=201.39 log (υ/k 0 ) -301.78…”
Section: Effect Of Pa and Fa Sweep Rate At Poly (Eosin) Modified Cpementioning
confidence: 99%