2018
DOI: 10.3389/fninf.2018.00003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simultaneous Estimation of Low- and High-Order Functional Connectivity for Identifying Mild Cognitive Impairment

Abstract: Functional connectivity (FC) network has been becoming an increasingly useful tool for understanding the cerebral working mechanism and mining sensitive biomarkers for neural/mental disease diagnosis. Currently, Pearson's Correlation (PC) is the simplest and most commonly used scheme in FC estimation. Despite its empirical effectiveness, PC only encodes the low-order (i.e., second-order) statistics by calculating the pairwise correlations between network nodes (brain regions), which fails to capture the high-o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
71
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
3
71
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In SR, the BOLD signal of a brain region is represented by a linear combination of the signals from a few of other regions. To measure higher‐level relationship between two ROIs, “high‐order” FC (HOFC) was proposed to define inter‐regional relationship by not measuring “low‐level” features (i.e., BOLD signals) but various “high‐level” features, which provides complementary information to the traditional “low‐order” (PC‐based) brain networks and indicates improved performance in disease diagnosis (Zhang, Chen, et al, ; Zhang, Chen, et al, ; Zhang, Shen, & Lin, ; Zhou, Zhang, Teng, Qiao, & Shen, ; Zhou, Qiao, Li, Zhang, & Shen, ). On the other hand, to avoid too sparse (thus may miss disease‐related FC alterations) brain networks derived from SR and respect inherent structures in the brain network, recent research has been designing new regularization terms to build more biologically meaningful brain networks, resulting in many variants of the SR methods (Qiao et al, ; Yu et al, ; Zhang, Zhang, et al, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In SR, the BOLD signal of a brain region is represented by a linear combination of the signals from a few of other regions. To measure higher‐level relationship between two ROIs, “high‐order” FC (HOFC) was proposed to define inter‐regional relationship by not measuring “low‐level” features (i.e., BOLD signals) but various “high‐level” features, which provides complementary information to the traditional “low‐order” (PC‐based) brain networks and indicates improved performance in disease diagnosis (Zhang, Chen, et al, ; Zhang, Chen, et al, ; Zhang, Shen, & Lin, ; Zhou, Zhang, Teng, Qiao, & Shen, ; Zhou, Qiao, Li, Zhang, & Shen, ). On the other hand, to avoid too sparse (thus may miss disease‐related FC alterations) brain networks derived from SR and respect inherent structures in the brain network, recent research has been designing new regularization terms to build more biologically meaningful brain networks, resulting in many variants of the SR methods (Qiao et al, ; Yu et al, ; Zhang, Zhang, et al, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, many recently-proposed FBN estimation models [35][36][37][38] can be unified under this regularized framework with different design of the two terms in Eq. (5).…”
Section: ) Regularized Fbn Estimation Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, 137 participants, including 68 MCIs and 69 NCs, are adopted in this experiment, which is also similar as (Zhou et al 2018). The scanning parameter includes: TR/TE = 3000/30mm, flip angle = 80, imaging matrix=64×64, 48 slices, 140 volumes, and voxel thickness = 3.3mm.…”
Section: Data Acquisitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At last, we put these time series into a data matrix X ∈ R 137×116 . For more details, please refer to (Zhou et al 2018).…”
Section: Data Acquisitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation