2013
DOI: 10.1002/cjs.11192
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simultaneous fixed and random effects selection in finite mixture of linear mixed‐effects models

Abstract: In this article, we study finite mixtures of linear mixed‐effects (FMLME) models that are useful for longitudinal regression modelling in the presence of heterogeneity in both fixed and random effects. These models are computationally challenging when the number of covariates is large, and traditional variable selection techniques become expensive to implement. We introduce a penalized likelihood approach, and propose a nested EM algorithm for efficient numerical computations. The resulting estimators are show… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, the mixing proportions varying as function of (sufficient fixed effect) predictors is similar to that of a mixture of experts model (Jordan & Jacobs 1994;Nguyen & Chamroukhi 2018), although in our approach these predictors do not also affect the mixture component densities. Furthermore, (1) could be considered a special case of a finite mixture of linear mixed effects models (Du et al 2013), where the random effects (and error variance) are common across mixture components, and the fixed effects only enter into the mixing proportions. Perhaps more importantly, and as we shall see in Section 3, the proposed approach means we can leverage the wide array of methods that have been developed for estimation and inference of finite mixture models, and employ them instead for the purposes of SDR.…”
Section: Comparison To Multiple-index and Other Finite Mixture Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, the mixing proportions varying as function of (sufficient fixed effect) predictors is similar to that of a mixture of experts model (Jordan & Jacobs 1994;Nguyen & Chamroukhi 2018), although in our approach these predictors do not also affect the mixture component densities. Furthermore, (1) could be considered a special case of a finite mixture of linear mixed effects models (Du et al 2013), where the random effects (and error variance) are common across mixture components, and the fixed effects only enter into the mixing proportions. Perhaps more importantly, and as we shall see in Section 3, the proposed approach means we can leverage the wide array of methods that have been developed for estimation and inference of finite mixture models, and employ them instead for the purposes of SDR.…”
Section: Comparison To Multiple-index and Other Finite Mixture Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pointed out by one reviewer, there is one paper by Du et al. (2013) worked on a mixture of LMM with variable selection that can handle high‐dimensional covariates. However, there are some limitations: (1) The selection of random effects in Du et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there are some limitations: (1) The selection of random effects in Du et al. (2013)'s paper is through the penalization of the diagonal elements of the random effects. If the diagonal element is estimated to be zero, then all the corresponding off‐diagonal elements are assumed to be zero.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yang (2012) proposed Bayesian variable selection for logistic mixed model with nonparametric random effects. Du et al (2013) considered the fixed and random effects selection in finite mixture of linear mixed-effects models. Lin et al (2013) proposed a two-stage model selection procedure for the linear mixed-effects models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%