2016
DOI: 10.2118/179740-pa
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simultaneous History-Matching Approach by Use of Reservoir-Characterization and Reservoir-Simulation Studies

Abstract: Summary Reservoir characterization is the key to success in history matching and production forecasting. Thus, numerical simulation becomes a powerful tool to achieve a reliable model by quantifying the effect of uncertainties in field development and management planning, calibrating a model with history data, and forecasting field production. History matching is integrated into several areas, such as geology (geological characterization and petrophysical attributes), geophysics (4D-seismic data… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
20
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…For sampling (Sect. 3.1), we propose the integration of attributes from the static modeling, such as fracture aperture, length and orientation, which generate images, with other attributes such as coefficient of relative permeability curve or capillary pressure, differently from previous works by, for instance, Maschio and Schiozer (2016) who applied regional multipliers and Avansi et al (2016) who applied a virtual well method (similar to pilot point) to perturb images. For the uncertainty reduction step (Sect.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For sampling (Sect. 3.1), we propose the integration of attributes from the static modeling, such as fracture aperture, length and orientation, which generate images, with other attributes such as coefficient of relative permeability curve or capillary pressure, differently from previous works by, for instance, Maschio and Schiozer (2016) who applied regional multipliers and Avansi et al (2016) who applied a virtual well method (similar to pilot point) to perturb images. For the uncertainty reduction step (Sect.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We use Discrete Latin Hypercube (DLHC) in a history-matching process integrated with static modeling (as opposed to traditional history-matching methods, which do not include this integration), allowing direct contact with geostatistical attributes and consistent modifications of the reservoir model. Figure 1 shows the general history-matching workflow, introduced by Avansi et al (2016). Our methodology contributes to Step 4, sampling and generating models; and…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As mentioned previously, uncertainties were divided into two groups, scalar and petrophysical. Avansi and Schiozer (2015) and Avansi et al (2016) performed a careful modeling of the benchmark. Table 2 shows the uncertain attributes considered and their initial parameterization.…”
Section: Application: Unisim-i-hmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meanwhile, the comparison steps are supported by production history data, where each modification in the simulation models is quantified and diagnosed during the assisted history matching. The deviations of production history data throughout initial and updated simulation models can be evaluated either qualitatively (graph analysis) or quantitatively using the normalized quadratic deviations with sign (NQDS) as described in Avansi, Maschio and Schiozer (). NQDS is a normalized quadratic error that is used to quantify the misfit between all historical and simulation objective functions based on acceptance criteria.…”
Section: Reservoir Model Updating Workflowmentioning
confidence: 99%